Skip to content

[hermes] Roll prebuilts#3163

Closed
joshlf wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw
Closed

[hermes] Roll prebuilts#3163
joshlf wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw

Conversation

@joshlf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Mar 29, 2026

While we're here, upgrade the Hermes CI workflow to run on the
ubuntu-24.04-64core runner, which has 64 cores and 256GB of RAM. This
allows our (very expensive) integration test suite to complete in a
reasonable amount of time.

While we're here, modify .github/actions/cache/action.yml to only
restore the cache, not save it, when operating in "restore" mode.
Previously, when operating in "restore" mode, that action used the
actions/cache action, which both restores a cache and attempts to
update it afterwards. We don't make use of the updated cache, and it
adds overhead to CI execution which becomes very large now that we are
running Hermes integration tests in CI, which generate a large disk
footprint in target.


Latest Update: v7 — Compare vs v6

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 vs v6 vs v5 vs v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v6 vs v5 vs v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v5 vs v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v2 vs v1 vs Base
v1 vs Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw && git checkout -b pr-Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

gherrit-pr-id: Gr4qottxa22y4kfhk2a5vctnhsswyoiac
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Optimistically Approved: Changes appear scoped. Final strict verification will occur in the Merge Queue.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Mar 29, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (1c20e84) to head (b183481).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                        Coverage Diff                         @@
##           Gr4qottxa22y4kfhk2a5vctnhsswyoiac    #3163   +/-   ##
==================================================================
  Coverage                              91.85%   91.85%           
==================================================================
  Files                                     20       20           
  Lines                                   6067     6067           
==================================================================
  Hits                                    5573     5573           
  Misses                                   494      494           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw branch from f2b45f9 to 39a4877 Compare March 29, 2026 21:39
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Optimistically Approved: Changes appear scoped. Final strict verification will occur in the Merge Queue.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw branch from 39a4877 to b232afc Compare March 29, 2026 21:43
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Optimistically Approved: Changes appear scoped. Final strict verification will occur in the Merge Queue.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw branch from b232afc to 080e06a Compare March 29, 2026 21:49
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Optimistically Approved: Changes appear scoped. Final strict verification will occur in the Merge Queue.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw branch from 080e06a to 5198c12 Compare March 29, 2026 21:57
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Optimistically Approved: Changes appear scoped. Final strict verification will occur in the Merge Queue.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw branch from 5198c12 to 2d32a8e Compare March 29, 2026 22:26
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 Optimistically Approved: Changes appear scoped. Final strict verification will occur in the Merge Queue.

While we're here, upgrade the Hermes CI workflow to run on the
`ubuntu-24.04-64core` runner, which has 64 cores and 256GB of RAM. This
allows our (very expensive) integration test suite to complete in a
reasonable amount of time.

While we're here, modify `.github/actions/cache/action.yml` to *only*
restore the cache, not save it, when operating in "restore" mode.
Previously, when operating in "restore" mode, that action used the
`actions/cache` action, which both restores a cache *and* attempts to
update it afterwards. We don't make use of the updated cache, and it
adds overhead to CI execution which becomes very large now that we are
running Hermes integration tests in CI, which generate a large disk
footprint in `target`.

gherrit-pr-id: Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gliiuhmmjpxnlhekzzccdf2jteq6louuw branch from 2d32a8e to b183481 Compare March 29, 2026 22:48
Base automatically changed from Gr4qottxa22y4kfhk2a5vctnhsswyoiac to main March 29, 2026 23:37
@joshlf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

joshlf commented Mar 29, 2026

Superseded by #3167

@joshlf joshlf closed this Mar 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants