Skip to content

Add steps for reporting first-paint#123

Open
shubhamg13 wants to merge 1 commit into
w3c:mainfrom
shubhamg13:first-paint-defination
Open

Add steps for reporting first-paint#123
shubhamg13 wants to merge 1 commit into
w3c:mainfrom
shubhamg13:first-paint-defination

Conversation

@shubhamg13
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shubhamg13 shubhamg13 commented Mar 20, 2026

Adds steps for the first-paint. Adds note for clarity of

  1. Background Color
  2. iframes

Closes #122


Preview | Diff

Signed-off-by: Shubham Gupta <shubham.gupta@chromium.org>
@shubhamg13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

shubhamg13 commented Mar 20, 2026

Hi @noamr, Please help in review.
cc: @xiaochengh

@shubhamg13 shubhamg13 changed the title Add First Paint Definition Add steps for reporting first-paint Mar 23, 2026
@noamr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

noamr commented Mar 23, 2026

Looks good, but need to sort the IPR thingy :)

@yoavweiss
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shubhamg13 - can you join the WebPerfWG?

@shubhamg13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@shubhamg13 - can you join the WebPerfWG?

My company is not yet participating in WebPerfWG (or any WG)?

@yoavweiss
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@caribouW3 - can you help? Can we take a one time IPR commitment here?

@caribouW3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@shubhamg13 's company is a W3C member organization, so the AC rep should make the commitment using the WG's join form. A non-member licensing form will not work.

@shubhamg13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

shubhamg13 commented Mar 23, 2026

@shubhamg13 - can you join the WebPerfWG?

Can this be accepted if I mark this as non-substantive?

@w3cbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

w3cbot commented Mar 23, 2026

shubhamg13 marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

@noamr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

noamr commented Mar 23, 2026

Not sure if we can qualify this as non substantive.

@caribouW3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

caribouW3 commented Mar 23, 2026

https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#substantive-change
"Changes which resolve ambiguities in the specification are considered to change (by clarification) the implementation requirements."
In other words, if the implementation needs changes, even subtle, it is substantive.

@w3cbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

w3cbot commented Mar 23, 2026

caribouW3 marked as substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

@shubhamg13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

shubhamg13 commented Mar 24, 2026

Hmm, can this be tweaked?

  1. If this has Co-Author, and
  2. Co-Author has IPR rights.

@noamr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

noamr commented Mar 24, 2026

Hmm, can this be tweaked?

  1. If this has Co-Author, and
  2. Co-Author has IPR rights.

Please join the group via your company instead of looking for a workaround.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

first-paint marking steps are missing important details. Should it consider paintable or not.

5 participants