-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
fix: kill stale wine processes before launch #1195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
xXJSONDeruloXx
wants to merge
3
commits into
utkarshdalal:master
Choose a base branch
from
xXJSONDeruloXx:fix/prelaunch-kill-orphan-wine-procs
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+54
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Back press is fully swallowed during loading with no fallback.
At Line 1100, Back is intercepted; at Lines 1101-1102, the empty handler creates a dead-end if prelaunch/loading hangs. Please add either a safe cancel path or a timeout fallback that restores normal back behavior.
I can draft a small cancellable prelaunch pattern (job + cancel signal + UI fallback) if you want me to open a follow-up issue proposal.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's the idea for this scope, it's effectively same in master right now yeah? Animation persists even if you can supposedly back out, procs stick and you need force quit because of it anyway. This just mitigates impatient back mash on loading screen till a separate PR does proper retreat and cleanup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@xXJSONDeruloXx, that's a fair point — if master already reaches a force-quit situation on back-during-loading (stale procs keep the animation alive regardless), then blocking the back key here is at least an honest no-op instead of a misleading one. TheBackHandlerprevents the UI thrash without making the underlying problem any worse.I'll note this for future reviews and happy to open a follow-up issue for the proper cancellable-prelaunch work whenever you're ready.
✏️ Learnings added
🧠 Learnings used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in some situations, installing mono runs indefinitely. This was happening on some box64/fex versions. I guess users can force stop or swipe the app away if that happens?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@utkarshdalal yeah swipe away like they do now, just with this pr they can now get a clean slate when re entering. Back button still wouldn't dismiss loading animation for boot but would retreat ui in the background. This keeps ux same but unintended soft lock till force kill is solved