Skip to content

Cfe04 config meta data v2#231

Open
Nefarious46 wants to merge 14 commits into
teragrep:mainfrom
Nefarious46:cfe04ConfigMetaDataV2
Open

Cfe04 config meta data v2#231
Nefarious46 wants to merge 14 commits into
teragrep:mainfrom
Nefarious46:cfe04ConfigMetaDataV2

Conversation

@Nefarious46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Finished table designs for cfe04 storage side.
Fixes issues #172 and #121

@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 requested a review from kortemik February 19, 2026 11:42
@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 self-assigned this Feb 19, 2026
@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 added enhancement New feature or request review labels Feb 19, 2026
@Nefarious46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Currently blocked by issue #237 . Requires relevant endpoints to allow unit testing Capture Storage insertion which is currently impossible unless data is injected between integration testing. This is bad practise. Thus endpoints should be firstly created to support this feature.

@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 force-pushed the cfe04ConfigMetaDataV2 branch from 5194f29 to dc97561 Compare March 16, 2026 07:19
@Nefarious46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Force pushed rebase. Still requires to implement StorageIndex and StorageSourcetype endpoints to support tests.

@Nefarious46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

#237 is implemented here aswell due to schema changes here rely on the issue and vice versa.

@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 force-pushed the cfe04ConfigMetaDataV2 branch from 90a0548 to 4a9db51 Compare May 8, 2026 08:31
@Nefarious46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Creating ApiClient here for testing aswell.

@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 removed the request for review from kortemik May 8, 2026 08:32
@Nefarious46
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Now utilizes TestApiClient with StorageSourcetypes and StorageIndexes unit tests.

@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 requested a review from kortemik May 8, 2026 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants