Skip to content

working solution#1261

Open
avcode3 wants to merge 2 commits intosuper30admin:masterfrom
avcode3:master
Open

working solution#1261
avcode3 wants to merge 2 commits intosuper30admin:masterfrom
avcode3:master

Conversation

@avcode3
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@avcode3 avcode3 commented Mar 29, 2026

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Subsets (problem1.py)

Your solution is excellent! It correctly generates all subsets using a backtracking approach. Here are some strengths and minor suggestions:

Strengths:

  • You used backtracking with a single path list, which is efficient in space because it avoids creating multiple copies of the list during recursion. This is better than the reference solution that creates a new list for the "choose" branch.
  • You correctly use path.copy() when appending to final_arr to avoid references to the same list.
  • The code is clean, readable, and well-organized.

Areas for Improvement:

  • While the code is correct, consider adding comments to explain the backtracking steps (e.g., "choose" and "unchoose") for better readability, especially for those learning the pattern.
  • The variable name final_arr could be more descriptive, such as result or subsets, to match the problem context.
  • Although not necessary, you could consider using type hints for the helper function parameters for consistency (e.g., i: int).

Overall, this is a high-quality solution that is both correct and efficient.

VERDICT: PASS


Palindrome Partitioning (problem2.py)

Your solution is correct and efficient. You have successfully implemented the backtracking algorithm for palindrome partitioning. Here are a few points for improvement:

  1. Copying the Path: You correctly use list(path) to create a copy of the path when adding to final_arr. This is necessary because lists are mutable and without creating a copy, the subsequent backtracking steps would modify the list. Alternatively, you could use path[:] which is also common and efficient.

  2. Naming Conventions: While your variable names are descriptive, consider using more conventional names. For example, final_arr could be renamed to result or output to align with common practices. However, this is a minor point.

  3. Precomputation for Palindrome Checks: Although not necessary for the given constraints, you could consider precomputing a DP table for palindrome checks to avoid redundant checks. This would reduce the time complexity of palindrome checks from O(n) per substring to O(1) after O(n^2) precomputation. However, for n=16, it might not be needed.

  4. Type Hints: You have included type hints for the function signatures, which is good practice. However, the helper function could also benefit from type hints (e.g., pivot: int, path: List[str]). This is optional but improves readability.

Overall, your code is clean and correct. Well done!

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants