Skip to content

Completed BFS-1#1639

Open
ashritha0806 wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
ashritha0806:master
Open

Completed BFS-1#1639
ashritha0806 wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
ashritha0806:master

Conversation

@ashritha0806
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Level Order Traversal in Binary tree (level_order.py)

Strengths:

  • The solution correctly handles the base case when the root is None.
  • The use of deque from collections is appropriate for efficient queue operations.
  • The code is well-commented, explaining the approach clearly.
  • The logic for processing each level by recording the size of the queue at the start of the level is correctly implemented.

Areas for Improvement:

  • While the code is correct, it's important to note that in Python, deque is efficient for popping from the left, but for small inputs, using a list and pop(0) would be inefficient due to O(n) time for each pop. The student has correctly avoided this by using deque, which is good.
  • The comment mentions "Got confused while implementing call and storing list for each level." This suggests that the student might have faced some initial challenges. It would be helpful to review the concept of queues and how they are used in level-order traversal to solidify understanding.
  • The code could include a docstring for the method to describe parameters and return values more formally, but this is minor.

Overall, the solution is efficient and adheres to the problem requirements.

VERDICT: PASS


Scheduling Courses (course.py)

Your solution is generally correct and efficient. You have implemented Kahn's algorithm correctly. However, there are a few improvements needed:

  1. You need to import deque: Add from collections import deque at the top. Without this, the code will throw an error.

  2. Your code does not handle the case when the graph has no edges (no prerequisites) correctly? Actually, it does: because initially, all courses have indegree 0 (since we initialize indegree to zeros). So for each course, indegree[pre[0]] is incremented for each prerequisite. So if there are no prerequisites, indegree remains zeros for all. Then the initial loop adds all courses to the queue, and count becomes numCourses, so we return True immediately. So it's correct.

  3. However, in the while loop, you check if dependency: which is good. But note: your graph is built only for courses that are prerequisites (i.e., the key is the prerequisite course). So if a course has no dependents, it won't be in the graph. This is correct.

  4. You can simplify the code by returning count == numCourses at the end. Currently, you return False at the end. But if count equals numCourses, we should return True. However, you have an early return inside the while loop when count becomes numCourses. So if we break out of the while loop without having count==numCourses, we return False. So it's correct. But it's more common to just return count == numCourses at the end.

  5. Also, you have an initial check: if count == numCourses: return True after building the queue. This is redundant because if count==numCourses, we can return True. But it's a good optimization.

  6. The initial check if not q: return False is not necessary because if there are no independent nodes, then the while loop won't run, and we return False at the end. So you can remove that check and just proceed. Then at the end, return count == numCourses.

Revised code structure:
Build indegree and graph.
Initialize q and count=0.
For each course i: if indegree[i]==0, add to q and count++.
Then while q:
pop course
for each dependent course:
reduce indegree
if indegree becomes 0: add to q and count++.
return count == numCourses

This is simpler and avoids multiple returns.

  1. Also, you should initialize the graph as a dictionary that maps every course? Actually, no. Only courses that are prerequisites (have dependents) are added. So it's fine.

But note: if there are courses that are not prerequisites and also not required by any prerequisite? They are independent and are added initially. So it's covered.

Overall, your solution is correct except for the missing import. With that fixed, it should work.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants