chore: remove multi-review action#101
Conversation
The opencode github run subprocess approach is fundamentally flawed: stdout contains only CLI boilerplate, never the actual AI review content. After multiple failed iterations (PR #87, #90, #98), removing this module to prepare for a replacement approach. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
有条件合并 总结PR 删除了 阻塞项
两个问题都会导致 CI pipeline 直接失败,属于 不可合并 级别的阻塞,需至少修复这两处才能合并。 建议项
|
|
分析了所有相关引用后,以下是审计结果: 发现遗漏 该 PR 删除了 CRITICAL
MEDIUM
LOW
|
|
架构有问题 架构分析摘要PR 删除了 阻塞项
这两个问题都导致可执行路径(CI、测试)直接失败,属于不可合并级别。 建议项
|
- Delete .github/workflows/multi-review.yml - Delete tests/test_multi_review.py - Remove multi-review from README.md action list, docs, and usage examples - Remove multi-review from skills/setup-ci/ documentation and action reference - Fix architect-review section that was accidentally merged in actions-reference.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
可合并 总结PR 删除了 阻塞项:无此前评论提到的问题均已在当前 HEAD 修复:
建议项
|
|
架构合理 PR 是一个干净的模块删除操作:删除了 阻塞项:无 建议项:
|
|
Now I have all the information needed. Let me analyze the PR against its stated requirements. PR Spec (from title + body):
PR Implementation:
遗留以下文件未被清理: 发现遗漏 该 PR 的删除范围与描述基本一致,但遗留了一个 openspec 设计文档目录未被清理。 MEDIUM
|






Summary
multi-review/directory entirely (action.yml, run-multi-review.py, reviewers/, README.md)opencode github runsubprocess approach has a fundamental flaw: stdout contains ONLY CLI boilerplate (permissions, session info, tool calls), never the actual AI review contentContext
See the discussion issue for detailed analysis of why this approach failed and what alternatives we're considering.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code