[Docker] Ignore appsettings.Development.json in the backend

[imnasnainaec]

This change is 

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Improved Docker build configuration to exclude development settings from being included in the container image.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Added appsettings.Development.json to the Backend .dockerignore file, preventing the development configuration file from being included in the Docker build context and final container image.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Docker Configuration Backend/.dockerignore	Added appsettings.Development.json to exclude development settings from Docker builds, ensuring development-specific configuration is not copied into container images.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A little file we tuck away,
Development settings hidden from the fray,
Into the Docker image they shall not creep,
Our secrets safe, in ignorance they sleep! 📦✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding appsettings.Development.json to the Docker ignore file in the backend.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch backend-docker-ignore-dev

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.23%. Comparing base (e0c5628) to head (6509657).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4226       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   75.94%   87.23%   +11.29%     
===========================================
  Files         303       57      -246     
  Lines       11352     5078     -6274     
  Branches     1407      620      -787     
===========================================
- Hits         8621     4430     -4191     
+ Misses       2330      506     -1824     
+ Partials      401      142      -259     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backend	87.23% <ø> (ø)
frontend	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[jasonleenaylor]

@jasonleenaylor reviewed 1 file and all commit messages, and made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on imnasnainaec).