Open
Conversation
Diggsey
reviewed
Mar 12, 2026
| * or if all the following conditions are met: | ||
| * The crate has a single owner, | ||
| * The crate has been downloaded less than 100 times for each month it has been published, | ||
| * The crate is not depended upon by any other crate on crates.io (i.e. it has no reverse dependencies), excluding yanked versions of crates that were published over a year ago |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With the proposed changes it becomes important to specify whether this is a direct or a transitive dependency.
(eg. consider [regular crate] -> [yanked crate] -> [crate to be deleted])
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I decided to just elaborate this section more fully to make it clearer; what do you think now?
kennytm
reviewed
Mar 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This RFC proposes adding a number of "reasonable changes" to the current crates.io deletion policy that will allow the deletion of several "reasonable to delete" crates which currently do not qualify.
They are definitely, directly, shamelessly motivated by the personal experience of the RFC author. Please let them know if anything was poorly or hastily worded.
Important
When responding to RFCs, try to use inline review comments (it is possible to leave an inline review comment for the entire file at the top) instead of direct comments for normal comments and keep normal comments for procedural matters like starting FCPs.
This keeps the discussion more organized.
Rendered