Add reusable workflow for performing rustc-pull on CI#9
Merged
Kobzol merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom Jul 10, 2025
Merged
Add reusable workflow for performing rustc-pull on CI#9Kobzol merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Kobzol merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
I tried this on my fork, but testing CI is hard. Let's merge and test it on RDG, and we'll see how it goes. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a reusable CI workflow from https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/blob/master/.github/workflows/rustc-pull.yml and generalizes it so that it can be used on other repositories.
The README.md explains how the workflow works. The TLDR is that it runs
rustc-josh-sync pullon the subtree and automatically creates/updates a running PR with the changes.We should still improve the logic so that we don't create a PR if the diff is empty, but that's orthogonal to this.