Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@wavefront/server/background_jobs/rag_ingestion/pyproject.toml`:
- Line 14: Update the NLTK dependency string currently listed as "nltk>=3.9.0"
to a secure minimum or latest patched release (e.g., "nltk>=3.9.4" or at least
"nltk>=3.9.3") in the pyproject.toml so the project no longer allows vulnerable
3.9.x releases; locate the exact dependency line "nltk>=3.9.0" and replace it
with "nltk>=3.9.4".
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 5b98b970-d9ec-4d93-909e-addb537a362a
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
wavefront/server/uv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
wavefront/server/background_jobs/rag_ingestion/pyproject.toml
Summary by CodeRabbit