Skip to content

Rename spock.seq_sync to spock.sync_seq#359

Closed
zaidshabbir25 wants to merge 2 commits intopgEdge:mainfrom
zaidshabbir25:patch-3
Closed

Rename spock.seq_sync to spock.sync_seq#359
zaidshabbir25 wants to merge 2 commits intopgEdge:mainfrom
zaidshabbir25:patch-3

Conversation

@zaidshabbir25
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I verified this with Spock 5.0.5 and could not find any function named seq_sync. However, a similar function named sync_seq is present.

I verified this with Spock 5.0.5 and could not find any function named seq_sync. However, a similar function named sync_seq is present.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation for the spock sequence synchronization function was updated to rename the public API from spock.seq_sync() to spock.sync_seq(). The NAME, SYNOPSIS, and EXAMPLE sections were modified to reflect this API naming change. No functional code modifications were introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation API Reference
docs/spock_functions/functions/spock_seq_sync.md
Updated function name references from spock.seq_sync() to spock.sync_seq() across NAME, SYNOPSIS, and EXAMPLE documentation sections.

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hopped through docs so bright,
Renaming functions left and right!
From seq_sync to sync_seq it goes,
The API dances, as code evolves!
New names bring clarity and light! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly and clearly describes the main change: renaming spock.seq_sync to spock.sync_seq, which aligns perfectly with the documentation updates in the changeset.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the rationale for the rename by noting that seq_sync does not exist in Spock 5.0.5 while sync_seq does.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/spock_functions/functions/spock_seq_sync.md`:
- Line 1: Rename the documentation file
docs/spock_functions/functions/spock_seq_sync.md to
docs/spock_functions/functions/spock_sync_seq.md so the filename matches the
documented function spock.sync_seq(), and update all references to the function
in the site config and generated docs—specifically replace any occurrences of
spock.seq_sync() with spock.sync_seq() in mkdocs.yml and in
docs/spock_functions/gen_mgmt.md (and any other references) so the navigation
and links point to the correct function name.

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c94cb28 and cceafe8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/spock_functions/functions/spock_seq_sync.md

Comment thread docs/spock_functions/functions/spock_seq_sync.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants