Release 0.40.1

[usercont-release-bot]

Update the changelog and the specfile for release 0.40.1.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request systematically updates all relevant version indicators and changelog records across the project to prepare for the 0.40.1 release. The changes ensure that the project's documentation and build configurations accurately reflect the new version, maintaining consistency and clarity for future development and releases.

Highlights

• Changelog Update: A new entry for version 0.40.1 was added to CHANGELOG.md, documenting the latest release.
• Specfile Version Bump: The base_version was updated to 0.40.1 in the specfiles located in centos-integration-sig, epel8, and fedora directories.
• Specfile Changelog Entries: New changelog entries for release 0.40.1 were added to the specfiles for centos-integration-sig, epel8, and fedora, aligning with the new version.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• CHANGELOG.md
  • Added a new section for version 0.40.1.
• centos-integration-sig/python-specfile.spec
  • Updated the base_version to 0.40.1.
  • Added a new changelog entry for release 0.40.1.
• epel8/python-specfile.spec
  • Updated the base_version to 0.40.1.
  • Added a new changelog entry for release 0.40.1.
• fedora/python-specfile.spec
  • Updated the base_version to 0.40.1.
  • Added a new changelog entry for release 0.40.1.

Activity

• The pull request was automatically created by usercont-release-bot, indicating an automated release process.
• No other human or bot activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the version to 0.40.1 across the changelog and spec files. The changes in the spec files look correct. However, the main CHANGELOG.md file has an empty section for the new version. I've added a comment with a suggestion to add a placeholder entry and fix the formatting for consistency.

[centosinfra-prod-github-app]

Build succeeded.
https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/18210a79f6e44b6081089a65dd65c358

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 17s
✔️ specfile-tests-rpm-deps SUCCESS in 1m 51s
✔️ specfile-tests-pip-deps SUCCESS in 1m 49s

[centosinfra-prod-github-app]

Build succeeded.
https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/5d322c57b8a9492e9d4d7d2fc3663f4d

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 13s
✔️ specfile-tests-rpm-deps SUCCESS in 1m 57s
✔️ specfile-tests-pip-deps SUCCESS in 1m 43s

[centosinfra-prod-github-app]

Build succeeded (gate pipeline).
https://gateway-cloud-softwarefactory.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/40234ea4db2240238723b4b16f5e29e0

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 12s