Skip to content

build(docker): update codex-acp to 0.11.1 and add runtime utilities#250

Open
clsung wants to merge 1 commit intoopenabdev:mainfrom
clsung:dockerfile-codex
Open

build(docker): update codex-acp to 0.11.1 and add runtime utilities#250
clsung wants to merge 1 commit intoopenabdev:mainfrom
clsung:dockerfile-codex

Conversation

@clsung
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@clsung clsung commented Apr 12, 2026

  • Upgrade @zed-industries/codex-acp from 0.9.5 to 0.11.1.
  • Install procps and ripgrep in the runtime stage to support improved process monitoring (health check) and search capabilities (rg) within the container.

- Upgrade @zed-industries/codex-acp from 0.9.5 to 0.11.1.
- Install procps and ripgrep in the runtime stage to support improved
  process monitoring (health check) and search capabilities (rg)
  within the container.
@clsung clsung requested a review from thepagent as a code owner April 12, 2026 05:56
@thepagent thepagent added the p1 High — address this sprint label Apr 15, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@masami-agent masami-agent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review — PR #250

Clean, minimal change. Two items:

✅ What looks good

  1. codex-acp 0.9.5 → 0.11.1 — version bump is straightforward
  2. ripgrep addition — useful for agent search capabilities inside the container
  3. Single file, +2/-2 lines — tight scope

🟡 Potential overlap with PR #234

PR #234 (fix(docker): install procps for healthchecks) also adds procps to Dockerfile.codex (and all other Dockerfiles). If #234 merges first, this PR will have a merge conflict on the same apt-get install line.

Suggestion: coordinate with #234 — whoever merges first, the other should rebase. Or if both are ready, merge #234 first (it covers all 4 Dockerfiles) and then this PR only needs the codex-acp version bump + ripgrep.

Question

@clsung — is the codex-acp 0.11.1 upgrade a breaking change or backward compatible? Any release notes worth noting?

Otherwise this is ready to approve once the overlap with #234 is sorted out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

p1 High — address this sprint

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants