Cosmetic changes

[TomMelt]

Cosmetic changes

fixes #80

Note

This PR is only cosmetic. No functionality was intentionally changed. All the tests continue to pass.

Summary

• Renamed variables from snake_case to camelCase for consistency with C++ naming conventions
• Updated function names and parameters throughout the codebase
• Ensured all references to renamed variables are updated

The following cosmetic changes have been made to domain_decomp

• Uniform(ize)d the variable names and naming conventions.
• rename haloBufferPositions to haloEdgeBufferPositions
• change vertex to corner
• use CamelCase instead of underscores to bring in-line with nextsim

---

Renamed variables, functions, methods etc.

• get_width() → getWidth()
• get_height() → getHeight()
• domain_overlap() → domainOverlap()
• global_ext → globalExt
• local_ext → localExt
• total_num_procs → totalNumProcs
• num_procs → numProcs
• is_neighbour() → isNeighbour()
• is_corner_neighbour() → isCornerNeighbour()
• send_pos → sendPos
• recv_pos → recvPos
• get_bounding_box() → getBoundingBox()
• get_neighbour_info() → getNeighbourInfo()
• get_neighbour_info_periodic() → getNeighbourInfoPeriodic()
• save_mask() → saveMask()
• save_metadata() → saveMetadata()
• global_0 → global0
• global_1 → global1
• local_ext_0 → localExt0
• local_ext_1 → localExt1
• halo_sizes → haloSizes
• halo_send → haloSend
• halo_recv → haloRecv
• corner_ids → cornerIds
• corner_send → cornerSend
• num_corner_neighbours → numCornerNeighbours
• corner_send_pos → cornerSendPos
• global_ext_new → globalExtNew
• local_ext_new → localExtNew
• proc_id → procId
• global_extent_names → globalExtentNames
• corner_neighbours → cornerNeighbours
• corner_send_pos_p → cornerSendPos_p
• corner_neighbours_p → cornerNeighbours_p
• send_pos_p → sendPos_p
• recv_pos_p → recvPos_p

[joewallwork]

Thanks for going through and changing all these @TomMelt.

I assume we are going to stick with repo name domain_decomp rather than domainDecomp 😅

[TomMelt]

Thanks for going through and changing all these @TomMelt.

I assume we are going to stick with repo name domain_decomp rather than domainDecomp 😅

hahaha I hadn't thought of that 😅 ... but yes.