Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
@xronos-i-am Is this still desired functionality? Do you have a scenario where a sequence is created outside of a table, where it shouldn't be dumped? I could see a scenario where someone creates a sequence owned by some column, and we'd want to dump it. If you could explain the use case more, that would help. Thanks! |
Author
|
Hi. Yes it is still desireable. We use sequences without tables sometimes. When we assume that a related table may appear in the future, but we don't need it for now. We use sequence as autoincremented counter in that case |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sequence created without table should not be dropped from dump