Conversation
|
Huh, oddly enough I cant reproduce the issue. This is what it fails with. |
Hm, I have no idea what's going on here. What's |
|
|
| [1] identity [[2] [1] [3]] | ||
| ;; set comparison returns first value | ||
| #{1} identity [#{1} #{2}] | ||
| #{2} identity [#{2} #{1} #{3}]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not introduced by you but these tests don't fit the testing string, might be a good idea to just move these while you're here but don't want to give you extra work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wrote the original tests so I'm happy to move them. Though I'm not certain what you mean 😅. Should I make a set testing section or rename the section?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that Emma was saying this doesn't quite fit under "testing multiple types", so a new section would be ideal. This is a nit, though, so not a blocker for this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh understood. I should change the name to complex data types or something. Sorry I haven't gotten around to it. I've had a few family emergencies in the past week.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All good, my dude. Thank you for all of the help and the responsiveness when it comes to reporting issues and fixing them. That's all we can hope for. I hope that everything's ok on your end. Take whatever time you need; there's no urgency with this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes! Sorry for the late response but not a blocker and my point was what @jeaye said
|
Do we think this is still an issue? It's been a month since the last comment and it seems like Basilisp is running tests cleanly on |
Test that lpy ignores set values