Open
Conversation
ZeroMergeConflicts
suggested changes
Feb 23, 2026
ZeroMergeConflicts
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Feedback
Thanks for taking the time to submit this PR.
However, the changes introduced here appear to be highly specific to your own use case and don’t provide clear value to the broader user base or the project as a whole. Contributions should ideally benefit a wider audience or align with the general goals of the repository.
To keep the codebase clean and maintainable, I’d suggest avoiding PRs that are narrowly scoped to individual preferences unless they are configurable or broadly applicable.
Given this, I recommend closing this PR. Feel free to revisit with changes that can benefit more users or open a discussion beforehand to align on the direction.
Thanks for understanding.
Author
|
Sorry, I was just seeing if I could make an old merge-conflicted PR work
out. Not trying to come off rude or passive aggressive. Thank you for your
time.
…On Sun, Feb 22, 2026, 11:01 PM Zero Merge Conflicts < ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request.
Review Feedback
Thanks for taking the time to submit this PR.
However, the changes introduced here appear to be highly specific to your
own use case and don’t provide clear value to the broader user base or the
project as a whole. Contributions should ideally benefit a wider audience
or align with the general goals of the repository.
To keep the codebase clean and maintainable, I’d suggest avoiding PRs that
are narrowly scoped to individual preferences unless they are configurable
or broadly applicable.
Given this, I recommend closing this PR. Feel free to revisit with changes
that can benefit more users or open a discussion beforehand to align on the
direction.
Thanks for understanding.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4791 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWUL3J4HWMSUMBZUG2L5KYD4NKCTDAVCNFSM6AAAAACS27T77SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZTQMZZGE2TIOJZGA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reasons for making this change
I was looking around the open PRs and #4300 caught my eye: "Update Python.gitignore for tempCodeRunnerFile.py"
Links to documentation supporting these rule changes
formulahendry/vscode-code-runner#305
Merge and Approval Steps