Skip to content

CC staff are immune under space law#78

Open
DeltaDnDsolutions wants to merge 2 commits intofunky-station:mainfrom
DeltaDnDsolutions:CCImmunity
Open

CC staff are immune under space law#78
DeltaDnDsolutions wants to merge 2 commits intofunky-station:mainfrom
DeltaDnDsolutions:CCImmunity

Conversation

@DeltaDnDsolutions
Copy link

This proposes that CC vip's (in particular the NTR and Magistrate) become immune under space law.

@DeltaDnDsolutions DeltaDnDsolutions marked this pull request as ready for review March 8, 2026 20:39
@Idem778
Copy link

Idem778 commented Mar 8, 2026

So, one thing, IAAs should definitely be included in this immunity because they are also said to the SoP frontline, if a class one has to be delivered the IAA is send, if sec is to be inspected an IAA is send, the CC VIPs that pretty much always face spacelaw for doing their job and following orders are the IAAs
Oh and captain SoP 8 still exists, so there is one thing to hold CC VIPs accountable

@ferynn
Copy link
Collaborator

ferynn commented Mar 9, 2026

Not a fan of this change. Space law is meant to be Nanotrasen law, in how they run and organize the station.

Members of command/central command shouldn’t be immune to it. That’s not to say it can’t be or shouldn’t be biased towards them, or even unfair. Just that the unfairness should be represented in the laws themselves, rather than an immunity to them.

@DeltaDnDsolutions
Copy link
Author

the CC VIPs that pretty much always face spacelaw for doing their job and following orders are the IAAs

This is sort of exactly why I chose not to include IAA in here. This change isn't meant to come up often, and it comes with a certain degree of scrutiny that those affected aren't shitters about it. I want IAAs to be the overzealous attack dogs of the NTR, but not constantly brushing up against the law.

Oh and captain SoP 8 still exists, so there is one thing to hold CC VIPs accountable

Good point, in this change that sop would also have to go. Captain and Security can still detain CCvips, it'll just be an overt and direct breach of norms.

@DeltaDnDsolutions
Copy link
Author

Just that the unfairness should be represented in the laws themselves, rather than an immunity to them.

The way I might word it is that local security isn't to arrest CCvips, but instead report unlawful behavior to Central Command to be investigated. It just doesn't make sense to me that a company would allow local security to arrest their representatives on their own accord, what are your thoughts on that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants