Skip to content

Integrate Scraparr in Servarr as dependency#62

Merged
imgios merged 35 commits intodevfrom
feat/55-include-scraparr
Sep 26, 2025
Merged

Integrate Scraparr in Servarr as dependency#62
imgios merged 35 commits intodevfrom
feat/55-include-scraparr

Conversation

@mrgionsi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mrgionsi mrgionsi commented Feb 22, 2025

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The branch naming convention follows our guidelines
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

Feature: Introduce scraparr as subchart

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

There is no mechanism for exporting metrics for servarr

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Scarparr is introducing metrics to be used in prometheus.

Closes #55

@mrgionsi mrgionsi requested review from fonzdm and imgios February 22, 2025 13:16
@mrgionsi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@imgios I have added api_version ( with default value v3 ) for scraparr. Should the helm chart support this in the future in case someone wants to change it?

@imgios imgios changed the title Feat/55 include scraparr Integrate Scraparr in Servarr as dependency Feb 22, 2025
@imgios
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

imgios commented Feb 22, 2025

@imgios I have added api_version ( with default value v3 ) for scraparr. Should the helm chart support this in the future in case someone wants to change it?

This is an optional value, having it there is perfectly fine and future proof in my opinion.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@imgios imgios left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mrgionsi thanks for the contribution, it looks good so far!

I think we need to do some magic tricks to get the default values for the services URL param (e.g. servarr service name directly in scraparr configuration). As a result of your changes, the user is now required to manually fill in the URL values, which is not really the aim of servarr. Not sure if we want to include these changes in this PR or merge this and perform this development on another PR.

@fonzdm what's your POV here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@imgios imgios left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @mrgionsi, in addition to the previous message, just a few comments to point out what might be wrong.

For some reason, I didn't include these changes in the previous review.

@imgios imgios marked this pull request as draft February 22, 2025 17:27
@mrgionsi mrgionsi marked this pull request as ready for review February 22, 2025 18:14
@mrgionsi mrgionsi self-assigned this Feb 22, 2025
@imgios imgios self-requested a review February 23, 2025 09:50
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@imgios imgios left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @mrgionsi, just saw your latest changes and leaved few comments here and there.

@imgios imgios marked this pull request as draft February 23, 2025 09:58
@imgios imgios mentioned this pull request Feb 23, 2025
1 task
@imgios imgios added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 23, 2025
@imgios imgios marked this pull request as draft February 24, 2025 09:03
@mrgionsi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Hi @mrgionsi, I think you still forgot some typos behind. Can you please fix them? 🤓

Thanks @imgios. Finally I understood what was wrong, I hope

@mrgionsi mrgionsi marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2025 14:05
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@imgios imgios left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So far so good, nice one! 🚀

Just one thing, this needs to be tested before merging into dev branch.

@mrgionsi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

So far so good, nice one! 🚀

Just one thing, this needs to be tested before merging into dev branch.

Thanks mate.

@fonzdm Can you please test it and in case approve pr?

@fonzdm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

fonzdm commented Feb 24, 2025

So far so good, nice one! 🚀
Just one thing, this needs to be tested before merging into dev branch.

Thanks mate.

@fonzdm Can you please test it and in case approve pr?

I'm sorry, did you even try something before creating a PR???

@fonzdm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

fonzdm commented Feb 24, 2025

Joking, I will try asap 😁

@imgios
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

imgios commented Sep 26, 2025

Joking, I will try asap 😁

Thanks for your valuable feedback.

@imgios imgios merged commit 2cb7698 into dev Sep 26, 2025
@imgios imgios deleted the feat/55-include-scraparr branch September 26, 2025 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants