Open
Conversation
e8f18bb to
2211833
Compare
2211833 to
befc412
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces the
completioncommand for enabling shell completion. With click it's available out-of-box, just needed a handy command to use it easily. Tools likegh,pip,kubectletc have suchcompletioncommand too, so it's a well-known adopted pattern.Recording.2026-04-15.120439.mp4
This aligns with the same functionality for
gitt: entrius/gittensor#431The only thing which differs from
gittimplementation is thatalwuses heavy bittensor imports, which slow completions just a little, so I had to add a stub if we're inside of completion invocation. It's a common click limitation and it has several possible workarounds, but the most suitable is just stubbing.