Skip to content

Update zipp to 3.8.1#347

Closed
pyup-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
pyup-update-zipp-3.1.0-to-3.8.1
Closed

Update zipp to 3.8.1#347
pyup-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
pyup-update-zipp-3.1.0-to-3.8.1

Conversation

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR updates zipp from 3.1.0 to 3.8.1.

Changelog

3.8.1

======

Refreshed packaging.

Enrolled with Tidelift.

3.8.0

======

Removed compatibility code.

3.7.0

======

Require Python 3.7 or later.

3.6.0

======

78: Only ``Path`` is exposed in the public API.

3.5.1

======

77: Remove news file intended only for CPython.

3.5.0

======

74 and bpo-44095: Added ``.suffix``, ``.suffixes``,
and ``.stem`` properties.

3.4.2

======

Refresh package metadata.

3.4.1

======

Refresh packaging.

3.4.0

======

68 and bpo-42090: ``Path.joinpath`` now takes arbitrary
positional arguments and no longer accepts ``add`` as a
keyword argument.

3.3.2

======

Updated project metadata including badges.

3.3.1

======

bpo-42043: Add tests capturing subclassing requirements.

3.3.0

======

9: ``Path`` objects now expose a ``.filename`` attribute
and rely on that to resolve ``.name`` and ``.parent`` when
the ``Path`` object is at the root of the zipfile.

3.2.0

======

57 and bpo-40564: Mutate the passed ZipFile object
type instead of making a copy. Prevents issues when
both the local copy and the caller's copy attempt to
close the same file handle.

56 and bpo-41035: ``Path._next`` now honors
subclasses.

55: ``Path.is_file()`` now returns False for non-existent names.
Links

@pyup-bot pyup-bot mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2022
@pyup-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

pyup-bot commented Oct 8, 2022

Closing this in favor of #367

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this Oct 8, 2022
@engnogueira engnogueira deleted the pyup-update-zipp-3.1.0-to-3.8.1 branch October 8, 2022 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant