Use Promise.all() #16
Closed
imaman wants to merge 5 commits into
Closed
Conversation
|
I hope that one of these get accepted. Or the repository ownership should be transferred. @imaman Good work! |
|
I didnt see any movement here so went ahead and forked this and applied the PR. See this release: |
|
I tested this release working great for me. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Initial motivation for this PR was https://npmjs.com/advisories/781 .
This security issue can also be solved by other means (the two PRs opened on node.flow: dreamerslab/node.flow#4, dreamerslab/node.flow#5), I believe that migrating the code in here to using Promises is a course of action which will benefit the long term maintainability of this repo (as Promises are the de-facto standard for managing async computations).
In this PR I tried to be as conservative as possible: I just made the minimal change that could work. If you feel that it is OK for this code to use newer constructs (async/await, arrow functions) please let me know. I'd be happy to do this porting as well.