Skip to content

Remove lock files from renovate update#123

Merged
daniel-mizsak merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/update-renovate
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

Remove lock files from renovate update#123
daniel-mizsak merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/update-renovate

Conversation

@daniel-mizsak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@daniel-mizsak daniel-mizsak commented Apr 20, 2026

  • Linting passes
  • Tests are added and passing
  • Documentation is updated

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated development and documentation dependencies
    • Modified build tool configuration
    • Updated CI/CD configuration settings

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 15256b8d-945b-4acb-8fbf-e36053e9e9e9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between adf9893 and 59573a7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/renovate.json5
  • pyproject.toml
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/renovate.json5

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR removes the :maintainLockFilesWeekly preset from Renovate configuration and updates pyproject.toml by downgrading two development dependencies (ty and zensical) while restructuring the Uv tool configuration to consolidate settings under a new [tool.uv] table.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Renovate Configuration
.github/renovate.json5
Removed :maintainLockFilesWeekly from the extends preset list to eliminate scheduled lockfile maintenance behavior.
Project Configuration
pyproject.toml
Downgraded ty (0.0.31 → 0.0.29) and zensical (0.0.33 → 0.0.32); restructured Uv tool configuration by moving [tool.uv.build-backend] under new [tool.uv] table and added exclude-newer = "1 week" setting.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 No more weekly lockfile fuss,
Dependencies downgrade with nary a cuss,
Uv config now tidied and bright,
Maintenance schedules simplified right!
Hopping along to efficiency's delight. ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removing :maintainLockFilesWeekly from the Renovate configuration, which directly relates to removing lock file maintenance from the Renovate update process.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/update-renovate

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (adf9893) to head (59573a7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #123   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines            7         7           
=========================================
  Hits             7         7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

MegaLinter analysis: Success

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Warnings Elapsed time
✅ ACTION actionlint 3 0 0 0.0s
✅ COPYPASTE jscpd yes no no 1.14s
✅ MARKDOWN markdownlint 18 0 0 0.29s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 19 0 0 0.15s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no no 25.45s
✅ REPOSITORY gitleaks yes no no 0.08s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no no 0.0s
✅ REPOSITORY grype yes no no 38.27s
✅ REPOSITORY kics yes no no 1.48s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no no 0.84s
✅ REPOSITORY syft yes no no 1.34s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy yes no no 13.73s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy-sbom yes no no 0.2s
✅ REPOSITORY trufflehog yes no no 3.2s
✅ YAML prettier 9 0 0 0.98s
✅ YAML v8r 9 0 0 4.78s
✅ YAML yamllint 9 0 0 4.71s

See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security
Show us your support by starring ⭐ the repository

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 59573a7de7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread pyproject.toml
@daniel-mizsak daniel-mizsak merged commit 2663b24 into main Apr 20, 2026
7 checks passed
@daniel-mizsak daniel-mizsak deleted the feature/update-renovate branch April 20, 2026 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant