Skip to content

Add GitHub CODEOWNERS and branch-protection runbook#223

Open
leostar0412 wants to merge 3 commits into
cppalliance:developfrom
leostar0412:chore/add-github-codeowners
Open

Add GitHub CODEOWNERS and branch-protection runbook#223
leostar0412 wants to merge 3 commits into
cppalliance:developfrom
leostar0412:chore/add-github-codeowners

Conversation

@leostar0412
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@leostar0412 leostar0412 commented May 19, 2026

Summary

  • Add .github/CODEOWNERS with per-app owners, core/ and .github/workflows/ ownership, and docs/ reviewers (@snowfox1003, @jonathanMLDev, @wpak-ai).
  • Add docs/operations/CODEOWNERS_and_branch_protection.md with steps to require code-owner review and how to verify assignment after merge.
  • Refresh docs/operations/README.md to describe operations vs service API and link the new runbook.

Test plan

  • Confirm CODEOWNERS syntax / paths look correct on GitHub after merge.
  • (Repo admin) Enable Require review from Code Owners on the protected branch if not already on.
  • Optional: open draft PRs touching one app path, docs/, and .github/workflows/ to confirm requested reviewers.

Closes #216

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added guidance for enabling GitHub branch protection with code-owner review, verification steps for reviewer assignments, and scoped checks for workflow/docs/app changes.
    • Updated operations documentation wording and guidance, clarifying shared vs per-app responsibilities and improving the operations table and onboarding notes.
  • Chores

    • Introduced repository-wide code ownership assignments with placeholder mappings for key repository areas.

Review Change Stack

@leostar0412 leostar0412 self-assigned this May 19, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 19, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds a repository-wide .github/CODEOWNERS file with directory-specific owner assignments, documents CODEOWNERS and GitHub branch protection verification in docs/operations/CODEOWNERS_and_branch_protection.md, and updates docs/operations/README.md wording and table labels for operations terminology.

Changes

Code Ownership Configuration and Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
CODEOWNERS configuration
.github/CODEOWNERS
Header and rule definitions assigning default and directory-specific owners (@snowfox1003, @jonathanMLDev, @wpak-ai) to repository paths including core/, .github/workflows/, and docs/.
CODEOWNERS and branch protection guide
docs/operations/CODEOWNERS_and_branch_protection.md
New documentation describing how to enable GitHub branch protection requiring code owner review, how to verify owner assignment via draft PRs scoped to app paths, docs, and workflow paths, and how to update CODEOWNERS when ownership changes.
Operations documentation terminology update
docs/operations/README.md
Revised "Operations" overview to clarify shared, app-agnostic helpers, restructured table columns, and updated guidance to distinguish "Operations" from per-app "service API" for database writes.

Possibly related issues

  • #216: The PR adds the .github/CODEOWNERS file with per-directory mappings including core/, docs/, .github/workflows/, and a default fallback, matching the issue's requested changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~4 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • jonathanMLDev

Poem

🐰 Hop! A file of owners, neat and fair,

Paths marked true beneath the gardener's care,
Reviews will bloom where guardians stand,
Docs and workflows held by friendly hands,
A tiny hop to keep the repo grand.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Add GitHub CODEOWNERS and branch-protection runbook' directly and clearly summarizes the main changes: adding a CODEOWNERS file and a branch-protection runbook documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@leostar0412
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 19, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@leostar0412 leostar0412 requested a review from jonathanMLDev May 19, 2026 23:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add CODEOWNERS File for Review Assignment

1 participant