Skip to content

Move AI page to Start Here#886

Open
sirugh wants to merge 10 commits into
releasefrom
move-ai-sidebar
Open

Move AI page to Start Here#886
sirugh wants to merge 10 commits into
releasefrom
move-ai-sidebar

Conversation

@sirugh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sirugh sirugh commented May 14, 2026

Purpose of this pull request

This pull request relocates the AI documentation bundles topic from Resources into Get started, renames it to match what the page actually covers (Documentation bundles for AI tools), and rewrites the content for clearer beginner orientation: audience and outcome in the opening, concrete Cursor steps (including the llms.txt URL and a settings-search fallback), a Claude Code success check, trimmed non-duplicative tips (boilerplate alignment and optional page URL pastes), and redirects so old URLs keep working.

Associated JIRA ticket

COMDOX-1672

Affected pages

whatsnew
The storefront docs site now generates (with every build) llms text bundles for consumption by various AI tools and models. These bundles help developers ask questions in their editor's chat windows to get up-to-date docs information while they are building their storefronts.

@bdenham bdenham self-requested a review May 14, 2026 17:36
@bdenham bdenham added new-topic A major update published as an entirely new document feedback Update based on internal or external stakeholder feedback major-update Significant original updates to existing content and removed new-topic A major update published as an entirely new document labels May 14, 2026

## How to use context files

Each tool below supports either the public `llms.txt` URL, pasted bundle text, or a built-in documentation index when the feature exists.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add notes about how to also use AGENTS.md.

Comment thread src/content/docs/get-started/build-with-ai.mdx Outdated
sirugh and others added 3 commits May 14, 2026 13:50
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rugh <rugh@adobe.com>
- Always enable starlight-links-validator; exclude only generated llms paths
- Remove SKIP_LINK_VALIDATION from PR and Pages workflows
- Pages preview: run generate:llms before build; keep Supabase env for build step
- build-with-ai: use production Link URLs for bundle table

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@bdenham bdenham requested a review from dshevtsov as a code owner May 14, 2026 23:43
bdenham and others added 4 commits May 14, 2026 18:55
Match base-prefixed paths (for example GitHub Pages) so generated
llms bundles are excluded from internal route checks.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Drop scripts/REVERT-LLMS-DEPLOY-BASE.md; keep STOREFRONT-LLMS-DEPLOY-BASE grep marker in script and workflow.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
# STOREFRONT-LLMS-DEPLOY-BASE — env for scripts/generate-llms-full.js public doc URL (grep repo to revert).
- name: Build with Astro
id: build
run: NODE_ENV=github VITE_GITHUB_BASE_PATH=${{ steps.pages.outputs.base_path }} SKIP_LINK_VALIDATION=true pnpm astro build \
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the change here?

- name: Build
run: pnpm run build:prod
env:
SKIP_LINK_VALIDATION: 'true' # PR branches are incomplete by design
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What did this mean and why is it being removed in the context of this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feedback Update based on internal or external stakeholder feedback major-update Significant original updates to existing content new-topic A major update published as an entirely new document

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants