Skip to content

Mentioned the mandatory condition regarding limits for RR#355

Open
agupta-cruiser wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
update_retention_rules_limitations
Open

Mentioned the mandatory condition regarding limits for RR#355
agupta-cruiser wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
update_retention_rules_limitations

Conversation

@agupta-cruiser
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 27, 2026 09:59
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 27, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
cloudsmith-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 27, 2026 5:20pm

Request Review

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a clarifying note to the retention rules documentation explaining that at least one limit (Days, Count, or Size) must be greater than 0 for a retention rule to execute. This addresses a potential point of confusion for users configuring retention rules.

Changes:

  • Added a Note component highlighting the mandatory condition that at least one limit must be greater than 0 for retention rules to function

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link
Contributor

@clairemcdyre clairemcdyre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for raising this Aryan - could you move this note to the bottom of the deletion logic section? https://docs.cloudsmith.com/artifact-management/retention-rules#the-deletion-logic

I'll approve it once that is change is made.

Copy link
Contributor

@clairemcdyre clairemcdyre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants