Conversation
Contributor
|
@klmcadams Since this has a white background, it will work for both dark and white background. So i think either you can replace the existing logo and discard the other PR , or add the white and yellow logo. (not this rgb logo) |
Member
|
White background on dark mode might look pretty ugly... Can't we remove the white background and just have a thin white line like we used to have before surrounding the dark content? |
Contributor
Author
|
@Revathyvenugopal162 @RobPasMue Yeahh there's this option but the Synopsys isn't purple. Is that fine? I didn't come across one with just the white outline and purple Synopsys 
|
Member
|
Let's use this option, yes |
RobPasMue
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add dark mode logo for Ansys part of Synopsys. Related to #50
I couldn't check out the fork in #50, so that's why I made a separate PR