Aritra karan47 patch 12

[Aritra-Karan47]

kuchu bon

Summary by Sourcery

Documentation:

• Replace the previous author section in the README with new descriptive text.

[vercel]

@Aritra-Karan47 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Anik Chand's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Aritra-Karan47 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 0 minutes and 0 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7a7ac5b3-7d1a-422a-b974-fa50bed98c05

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 639d243 and 145a5a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Updates the README by replacing the existing author section with a single custom line of text.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replaced the README author section content.	Removed the 'Author' heading and attribution to the previous author. Inserted a new single-line sentence in place of the prior author section.	README.md

Possibly linked issues

• #readme change: The PR edits README.md content, directly addressing the issue’s request for a README change.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've found 1 issue, and left some high level feedback:

• The change replaces the existing author attribution section with an unrelated phrase; consider either preserving the original author credits or updating them in a way that clearly reflects project ownership and remains meaningful to readers.
• The new README text ('kuchu bon ne hege gelo') is unclear and not aligned with the rest of the document’s language and tone; revise it to a clear, project-relevant English description or heading.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The change replaces the existing author attribution section with an unrelated phrase; consider either preserving the original author credits or updating them in a way that clearly reflects project ownership and remains meaningful to readers.
- The new README text ('kuchu bon ne hege gelo') is unclear and not aligned with the rest of the document’s language and tone; revise it to a clear, project-relevant English description or heading.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="README.md" line_range="310" />
<code_context>
-
-**Anik Chand**
-Built with ❤️ using Go.
+kuchu bon ne hege gelo


</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**question (typo):** The newly added line seems unclear and may be unintended or need clarification.

The new text `kuchu bon ne hege gelo` replaces the author section and appears informal and/or non-English, which may confuse README readers. Is this intentional? If so, please add context or rephrase to match the tone and clarity of the rest of the document.
</issue_to_address>

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sourcery-ai]

question (typo): The newly added line seems unclear and may be unintended or need clarification.

The new text kuchu bon ne hege gelo replaces the author section and appears informal and/or non-English, which may confuse README readers. Is this intentional? If so, please add context or rephrase to match the tone and clarity of the rest of the document.