Skip to content

Aritra karan47 patch 8#30

Open
Aritra-Karan47 wants to merge 4 commits intoanikchand461:mainfrom
Aritra-Karan47:Aritra-Karan47-patch-8
Open

Aritra karan47 patch 8#30
Aritra-Karan47 wants to merge 4 commits intoanikchand461:mainfrom
Aritra-Karan47:Aritra-Karan47-patch-8

Conversation

@Aritra-Karan47
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Aritra-Karan47 Aritra-Karan47 commented Mar 28, 2026

hooliganism

Summary by Sourcery

Documentation:

  • Remove the author attribution section from the README and replace it with a brief closing note.

Reformatted README.md to improve structure and clarity.
Restored the README content for the Task CLI application, including setup instructions for macOS, Windows, and Linux, usage guide, data storage details, and development instructions.
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Mar 28, 2026

@Aritra-Karan47 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Anik Chand's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 28, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This PR modifies the README to remove the author attribution section and adds a short sentence near the end of the document.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Updated the README footer content and removed the explicit author section.
  • Removed the 'Author' section header near the end of the README.
  • Removed the author name and 'Built with ❤️ using Go.' line from the README.
  • Inserted a single-line note saying 'Don't ask to pr me again' in place of the removed section.
README.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 28, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Aritra-Karan47 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 1 minutes and 23 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: e8ab3807-71df-4fdb-b4aa-065e7a59d0e7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1a13c8 and b7b7feb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've found 1 issue, and left some high level feedback:

  • The added line Don't ask to pr me again is informal and unprofessional for a README; consider removing it or replacing it with project-relevant content.
  • Removing the Author section changes how project ownership/credit is communicated; if intentional, explain this rationale in the PR or consider retaining a more neutral attribution section instead.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The added line `Don't ask to pr me again` is informal and unprofessional for a README; consider removing it or replacing it with project-relevant content.
- Removing the `Author` section changes how project ownership/credit is communicated; if intentional, explain this rationale in the PR or consider retaining a more neutral attribution section instead.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="README.md" line_range="309" />
<code_context>
 ```

 ---
+Don't ask to pr me again

-## 🙌 Author
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (typo):** Consider capitalizing the acronym "PR" for clarity and correctness.

Here, "pr" refers to a pull request, which is conventionally written as "PR". Please update the text to "Don't ask to PR me again" to match standard usage.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

```

---
Don't ask to pr me again
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (typo): Consider capitalizing the acronym "PR" for clarity and correctness.

Here, "pr" refers to a pull request, which is conventionally written as "PR". Please update the text to "Don't ask to PR me again" to match standard usage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant