Conversation
Reformatted README.md to improve structure and clarity.
Update README.md for better formatting anikchand461#24
Restored the README content for the Task CLI application, including setup instructions for macOS, Windows, and Linux, usage guide, data storage details, and development instructions.
|
@Aritra-Karan47 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Anik Chand's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)Reviewer's GuideThis PR modifies the README to remove the author attribution section and adds a short sentence near the end of the document. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 1 minutes and 23 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've found 1 issue, and left some high level feedback:
- The added line
Don't ask to pr me againis informal and unprofessional for a README; consider removing it or replacing it with project-relevant content. - Removing the
Authorsection changes how project ownership/credit is communicated; if intentional, explain this rationale in the PR or consider retaining a more neutral attribution section instead.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The added line `Don't ask to pr me again` is informal and unprofessional for a README; consider removing it or replacing it with project-relevant content.
- Removing the `Author` section changes how project ownership/credit is communicated; if intentional, explain this rationale in the PR or consider retaining a more neutral attribution section instead.
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location path="README.md" line_range="309" />
<code_context>
```
---
+Don't ask to pr me again
-## 🙌 Author
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (typo):** Consider capitalizing the acronym "PR" for clarity and correctness.
Here, "pr" refers to a pull request, which is conventionally written as "PR". Please update the text to "Don't ask to PR me again" to match standard usage.
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
| Don't ask to pr me again |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (typo): Consider capitalizing the acronym "PR" for clarity and correctness.
Here, "pr" refers to a pull request, which is conventionally written as "PR". Please update the text to "Don't ask to PR me again" to match standard usage.
hooliganism
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation: