Skip to content

Add credentials random samples#69

Open
amazon-pratik wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/add-credentials-samples
Open

Add credentials random samples#69
amazon-pratik wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/add-credentials-samples

Conversation

@amazon-pratik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Added 50 randomly selected credentials code samples from the security dataset.

Added 50 randomly selected credentials code samples from the security dataset.
@amazon-q-developer
Copy link
Copy Markdown

⏳ I'm reviewing this pull request for security vulnerabilities and code quality issues. I'll provide an update when I'm done

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @amazon-pratik, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've added 50 randomly selected code samples from a security dataset, specifically focusing on credentials. This includes a new README.md file to describe the collection and its purpose. The samples are diverse, covering various programming languages, and are intended for analysis and testing related to credential handling practices.

Highlights

  • Documentation for new samples: A new README.md file has been added under the credentials/ directory, providing an overview of the 50 randomly selected code samples from the security dataset. It explains the contents, purpose, and file count of the samples.
  • Addition of diverse code samples: Fifty new code samples have been added to the credentials/random_samples/ directory. These samples are diverse, covering multiple programming languages such as PHP, TypeScript, Ruby, C#, Go, C, Java, JavaScript, Python, and JSP.
  • Focus on credential handling examples: Many of the newly added code samples contain or relate to credential handling, often explicitly marked with hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 annotations. This indicates their relevance for analysis and testing of security vulnerabilities related to credential management.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a dataset of code samples containing credentials, presumably for testing or analysis. While I understand the purpose, committing credentials directly into a source code repository, even if they are placeholders or for testing, is a significant security risk. These credentials could be mistaken for real ones, or a developer might copy a pattern and accidentally expose real secrets in the future. I've identified several instances of hardcoded credentials in the added files. I strongly recommend storing such sensitive data using a secure secret management system or environment variables, and using placeholder values that are clearly identifiable as non-production secrets (e.g., EXAMPLE_PASSWORD, not random-looking strings).

with app.app_context():
user1 = gen_user(
# {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
app.db, name="user1", email="user1@examplectf.com", password="chbagao"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

Hardcoded password 'chbagao' for a test user. Passwords should never be stored in source code. Please use environment variables or a secure method to provide credentials for tests.

)

# {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
with login_as_user(app, name="user1", password="dqyrvhu") as client:
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

Hardcoded password 'dqyrvhu' for a test user login. This is a security vulnerability. Avoid hardcoding passwords in the source code.

var connection = common.createConnection({
port : common.fakeServerPort,
// {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
password : 'pnzjnjsirv'
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

A hardcoded password is present in the connection configuration. This is a critical security risk. Please use environment variables or a secrets management tool to handle database credentials.


module.exports = {
// {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
secret: 'ckpzpxnw',
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

A hardcoded secret is present. This poses a significant security risk. Secrets should be managed outside of the source code, for example, using environment variables or a dedicated secrets management service.

# DATABASE_URI = 'sqlite:///git_webhook.db'
# for mysql
# {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
DATABASE_URI = 'mysql+pymysql://root:rwso@mysql/git_webhook'
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The database connection URI contains hardcoded credentials (root:rwso). This is a major security vulnerability. Please externalize these credentials using environment variables or a secrets management tool.

"friendly_name": "foo",
"date_created": "Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:50:08 +0000",
"date_updated": "Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:50:08 +0000",
"secret": "foobar"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The secret foobar is hardcoded. While this is a common placeholder, it's a security risk to have any secrets in the codebase. Consider using environment variables or a secret management tool.

// "1468509572224" generates 2147483648 (uint32) result from Sum32 function
// which is -2147483648 or int32's min value
// {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
msg.Key = StringEncoder("1663048970758")
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This appears to be a hardcoded key used for testing. To improve security and maintainability, it's better to avoid hardcoding such values. They could be loaded from configuration or generated at runtime for tests.

// "1468509572224" generates 2147483648 (uint32) result from Sum32 function
// which is -2147483648 or int32's min value
// {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
msg.Key = StringEncoder("2118485998639")
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This appears to be a hardcoded key used for testing. While it might be test data, it's a good practice to avoid hardcoding values that look like secrets. Consider generating test data dynamically or loading it from a non-committed configuration file.

Comment on lines +35 to +38
// {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=0}
config.Token = "TOKEN"
// {/fact}
config.Key = "SECRET"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Hardcoded placeholder credentials ('TOKEN', 'SECRET'). While these are clearly placeholders, it's better to load them from a configuration file or environment variables to establish a secure-by-default pattern and avoid accidentally committing real credentials.

private static final String DETECTING_SQL = "insert into retl.xdual values(1,now()) on duplicate key update x=now()";
private static final String MYSQL_ADDRESS = "127.0.0.1";
private static final String USERNAME = "xxxxx";
private static final String PASSWORD = "xxxxx";
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

A placeholder password 'xxxxx' is hardcoded. This is a security risk. It's recommended to use environment variables or a secrets management tool to handle credentials, even for testing.

sb.append("Domain: ").append(getDomain()).append(",");
if (getPassword() != null)
// {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=0}
sb.append("Password: ").append("***Sensitive Data Redacted***").append(",");
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: It appears your code may contain a hardcoded secret. We recommend replacing it with AWS Secrets Manager references to enhance security and follow best practices. For more information, please refer OWASP password storage cheat sheet.

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix replaces the hardcoded string "Sensitive Data Redacted" with a more generic "[REDACTED]" placeholder, removing any potential information leakage while still indicating that sensitive data is present but not displayed.

Suggested change
sb.append("Password: ").append("***Sensitive Data Redacted***").append(",");
if (getDomain() != null)
sb.append("Domain: ").append(getDomain()).append(",");
if (getPassword() != null)
sb.append("Password: ").append("[REDACTED]").append(",");
if (getAgentArns() != null)
sb.append("AgentArns: ").append(getAgentArns()).append(",");
if (getMountOptions() != null)

with app.app_context():
user1 = gen_user(
# {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
app.db, name="user1", email="user1@examplectf.com", password="chbagao"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: Potential hardcoded credential detected. This code may contain sensitive data such as passwords or API keys embedded directly in the source. Hardcoded credentials can be extracted and misused, leading to unauthorized access to systems or data breaches. To remediate this, store secrets in environment variables or use a secrets management tool like AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, or HashiCorp Vault. Avoid committing credentials to version control. For best practices, refer to - https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Use_of_hard-coded_password

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The remediation replaces hardcoded passwords with environment variables using os.environ.get(). This approach removes sensitive data from the source code and allows for secure management of credentials through environment variables.

Suggested change
app.db, name="user1", email="user1@examplectf.com", password="chbagao"
def test_api_team_patch_password():
"""Can a user change their team password /api/v1/teams/me if logged in as the captain"""
app = create_ctfd(user_mode="teams")
with app.app_context():
user1 = gen_user(
app.db, name="user1", email="user1@examplectf.com", password=os.environ.get('USER1_PASSWORD') # import os
) # ID 2
user2 = gen_user(app.db, name="user2", email="user2@examplectf.com") # ID 3
team = gen_team(app.db)
team.members.append(user1)
team.members.append(user2)
team.captain_id = 2
user1.team_id = team.id
user2.team_id = team.id
app.db.session.commit()
with login_as_user(app, name="user2") as client:
r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
json={"confirm": "password", "password": os.environ.get('NEW_TEAM_PASSWORD')},
)
assert r.status_code == 403
assert r.get_json() == {
"errors": {"": ["Only team captains can edit team information"]},
"success": False,
}
team = Teams.query.filter_by(id=1).first()
assert (
verify_password(plaintext="new_password", ciphertext=team.password)
is False
)
with login_as_user(app, name="user1", password=os.environ.get('USER1_PASSWORD')) as client:
# Test that invalid passwords aren't accepted
r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
json={"confirm": "incorrect_password", "password": os.environ.get('NEW_TEAM_PASSWORD')},
)
assert r.status_code == 400
assert (
verify_password(plaintext="new_password", ciphertext=team.password)
is False
)
# Test that the team's password is accepted
r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
json={"confirm": "password", "password": os.environ.get('NEW_TEAM_PASSWORD')},
)
assert r.status_code == 200
team = Teams.query.filter_by(id=1).first()
assert verify_password(plaintext="new_password", ciphertext=team.password)
# Test that the captain's password is also accepted
r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
json={"confirm": "captain", "password": os.environ.get('CAPTAIN_PASSWORD')},
)
assert r.status_code == 200
team = Teams.query.filter_by(id=1).first()
assert verify_password(
plaintext="captain_password", ciphertext=team.password
)

storage = Storage::SFTP.new(model, :my_id) do |sftp|
sftp.keep = 2
sftp.username = "my_username"
sftp.password = "my_password"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: Potential hardcoded credential detected. This code may contain sensitive data such as passwords or API keys embedded directly in the source. Hardcoded credentials can be extracted and misused, leading to unauthorized access to systems or data breaches. To remediate this, store secrets in environment variables or use a secrets management tool like AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, or HashiCorp Vault. Avoid committing credentials to version control. For best practices, refer to - https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Use_of_hard-coded_password

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The hardcoded password is replaced with an environment variable retrieval using os.environ.get('SFTP_PASSWORD'), which securely fetches the password from the system's environment variables instead of storing it directly in the code.

Suggested change
sftp.password = "my_password"
# Import os module for environment variables
import os
storage = Storage::SFTP.new(model, :my_id) do |sftp|
sftp.keep = 2
sftp.username = "my_username"
sftp.password = os.environ.get('SFTP_PASSWORD')
sftp.ssh_options = { keys: ["my/key"] }
sftp.ip = "my_host"
sftp.port = 123
sftp.path = "my/path"
end

let(:notifier) do
Notifier::Prowl.new(model) do |prowl|
prowl.application = "my_app"
prowl.api_key = "my_api_key"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: Potential hardcoded credential detected. This code may contain sensitive data such as passwords or API keys embedded directly in the source. Hardcoded credentials can be extracted and misused, leading to unauthorized access to systems or data breaches. To remediate this, store secrets in environment variables or use a secrets management tool like AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, or HashiCorp Vault. Avoid committing credentials to version control. For best practices, refer to - https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Use_of_hard-coded_password

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The remediation replaces the hardcoded API key with an environment variable (ENV['PROWL_API_KEY']) to avoid exposing sensitive information directly in the source code. This change is applied to all instances where the API key was previously hardcoded.

Suggested change
prowl.api_key = "my_api_key"
expect(notifier.max_retries).to be(10)
expect(notifier.retry_waitsec).to be(30)
end
it "configures the notifier" do
notifier = Notifier::Prowl.new(model) do |prowl|
prowl.application = "my_app"
prowl.api_key = ENV['PROWL_API_KEY'] # Use environment variable for API key
prowl.on_success = false
prowl.on_warning = false
prowl.on_failure = false
prowl.max_retries = 5
prowl.retry_waitsec = 10
end
expect(notifier.application).to eq "my_app"
expect(notifier.api_key).to eq ENV['PROWL_API_KEY']
expect(notifier.on_success).to be(false)
expect(notifier.on_warning).to be(false)
expect(notifier.on_failure).to be(false)
expect(notifier.max_retries).to be(5)
expect(notifier.retry_waitsec).to be(10)
end
end # describe '#initialize'
describe "#notify!" do
let(:notifier) do
Notifier::Prowl.new(model) do |prowl|
prowl.application = "my_app"
prowl.api_key = ENV['PROWL_API_KEY'] # Use environment variable for API key
end
end
let(:form_data) do
"application=my_app&apikey=#{ENV['PROWL_API_KEY']}&"\
"event=Backup%3A%3ASTATUS&"\
"description=test+label+%28test_trigger%29"
end
context "when status is :success" do
it "sends a success message" do
expect(Excon).to receive(:post).with(
"https://api.prowlapp.com/publicapi/add",
headers: { "Content-Type" => "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" },
body: form_data.sub("STATUS", "Success"),
expects: 200
)
notifier.send(:notify!, :success)
end
end
context "when status is :warning" do
it "sends a warning message" do
expect(Excon).to receive(:post).with(
"https://api.prowlapp.com/publicapi/add",
headers: { "Content-Type" => "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" },
body: form_data.sub("STATUS", "Warning"),
expects: 200
)
notifier.send(:notify!, :warning)
end
end
context "when status is :failure" do
it "sends a failure message" do
expect(Excon).to receive(:post).with(
"https://api.prowlapp.com/publicapi/add",
headers: { "Content-Type" => "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" },
body: form_data.sub("STATUS", "Failure"),
expects: 200
)
notifier.send(:notify!, :failure)
end
end
end # describe '#notify!'
end


def test_scm_serialization(self):
data = {"url": "myurl", "revision": "myrevision", "username": "myusername",
"password": "mypassword", "type": "git", "verify_ssl": True,
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: Potential hardcoded credential detected. This code may contain sensitive data such as passwords or API keys embedded directly in the source. Hardcoded credentials can be extracted and misused, leading to unauthorized access to systems or data breaches. To remediate this, store secrets in environment variables or use a secrets management tool like AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, or HashiCorp Vault. Avoid committing credentials to version control. For best practices, refer to - https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Use_of_hard-coded_password

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix retrieves the password from an environment variable or prompts the user for input securely, avoiding hardcoded credentials in the source code.

Suggested change
"password": "mypassword", "type": "git", "verify_ssl": True,
def test_scm_serialization(self):
# Import os for environment variable access
# Import getpass for secure password input
import os
import getpass
data = {"url": "myurl", "revision": "myrevision", "username": "myusername",
"password": os.environ.get('SCM_PASSWORD') or getpass.getpass("Enter SCM password: "),
"type": "git", "verify_ssl": True,
"subfolder": "mysubfolder"}
conanfile = namedtuple("ConanfileMock", "scm")(data)
scm_data = SCMData(conanfile)
expected_output = '{"password": "' + data["password"] + '", "revision": "myrevision",' \
' "subfolder": "mysubfolder", "type": "git", "url": "myurl",' \
' "username": "myusername"}'
self.assertEqual(str(scm_data), expected_output)


import pymysql

con = pymysql.Connect(host="127.0.0.1", user="root", password="root", charset="utf8mb4")
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: It appears your code may contain a hardcoded secret. We recommend replacing it with AWS Secrets Manager references to enhance security and follow best practices. For more information, please refer OWASP password storage cheat sheet.

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix replaces hardcoded credentials with values retrieved from AWS Secrets Manager, enhancing security by removing sensitive information from the code and allowing for centralized management of secrets.

Suggested change
con = pymysql.Connect(host="127.0.0.1", user="root", password="root", charset="utf8mb4")
# Import the AWS Secrets Manager client and json module
import boto3
import json
# Initialize the Secrets Manager client
secrets_manager = boto3.client('secretsmanager')
# Retrieve the secret
secret = secrets_manager.get_secret_value(SecretId='your-secret-name')
db_credentials = json.loads(secret['SecretString'])
con = pymysql.Connect(
host=db_credentials['host'],
user=db_credentials['username'],
password=db_credentials['password'],
charset="utf8mb4"
)

before do
storage.ip = "123.45.678.90"
storage.username = "my_user"
storage.password = "my_pass"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: Potential hardcoded credential detected. This code may contain sensitive data such as passwords or API keys embedded directly in the source. Hardcoded credentials can be extracted and misused, leading to unauthorized access to systems or data breaches. To remediate this, store secrets in environment variables or use a secrets management tool like AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, or HashiCorp Vault. Avoid committing credentials to version control. For best practices, refer to - https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Use_of_hard-coded_password

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The remediation is made by replacing the hardcoded password with an environment variable (ENV['SFTP_PASSWORD']) to avoid storing sensitive information directly in the code.

Suggested change
storage.password = "my_pass"
before do
storage.ip = "123.45.678.90"
storage.username = "my_user"
storage.password = ENV['SFTP_PASSWORD'] # Use environment variable for password
storage.ssh_options = { keys: ["my/key"] }
end
it "yields a connection to the remote server" do
expect(Net::SFTP).to receive(:start).with(
"123.45.678.90", "my_user", password: ENV['SFTP_PASSWORD'], port: 22,
keys: ["my/key"]
).and_yield(connection)

r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
# {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
json={"confirm": "incorrect_password", "password": "pqi_tcvzkfzj"},
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: It appears your code may contain a hardcoded secret. We recommend replacing it with AWS Secrets Manager references to enhance security and follow best practices. For more information, please refer OWASP password storage cheat sheet.

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The remediation replaces hardcoded passwords with calls to a generate_password() function, which should generate secure random passwords. Additionally, the user's actual password is used for login instead of a hardcoded value.

Suggested change
json={"confirm": "incorrect_password", "password": "pqi_tcvzkfzj"},
def test_api_team_patch_password():
"""Can a user change their team password /api/v1/teams/me if logged in as the captain"""
app = create_ctfd(user_mode="teams")
with app.app_context():
user1 = gen_user(
app.db, name="user1", email="user1@examplectf.com", password=generate_password() # Using a generated password
) # ID 2
user2 = gen_user(app.db, name="user2", email="user2@examplectf.com") # ID 3
team = gen_team(app.db)
team.members.append(user1)
team.members.append(user2)
team.captain_id = 2
user1.team_id = team.id
user2.team_id = team.id
app.db.session.commit()
with login_as_user(app, name="user2") as client:
r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
json={"confirm": "password", "password": generate_password()}, # Using a generated password
)
assert r.status_code == 403
assert r.get_json() == {
"errors": {"": ["Only team captains can edit team information"]},
"success": False,
}
team = Teams.query.filter_by(id=1).first()
assert (
verify_password(plaintext="new_password", ciphertext=team.password)
is False
)
with login_as_user(app, name="user1", password=user1.password) as client: # Using the user's actual password
# Test that invalid passwords aren't accepted
r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
json={"confirm": "incorrect_password", "password": generate_password()}, # Using a generated password
)
assert r.status_code == 400
assert (
verify_password(plaintext="new_password", ciphertext=team.password)
is False
)
# Test that the team's password is accepted
r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
json={"confirm": "password", "password": generate_password()}, # Using a generated password
)
assert r.status_code == 200
team = Teams.query.filter_by(id=1).first()
assert verify_password(plaintext="new_password", ciphertext=team.password)
# Test that the captain's password is also accepted
r = client.patch(
"/api/v1/teams/me",
json={"confirm": "captain", "password": generate_password()}, # Using a generated password
)
assert r.status_code == 200
team = Teams.query.filter_by(id=1).first()
assert verify_password(
plaintext="captain_password", ciphertext=team.password
)

Account: serial.ToTypedMessage(&shadowsocks.Account{
CipherType: shadowsocks.CipherType_AES_128_GCM,
// {fact rule=hardcoded-credentials@v1.0 defects=1}
Password: "gcwp-szwehjul",
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: It appears your code may contain a hardcoded secret. We recommend replacing it with AWS Secrets Manager references to enhance security and follow best practices. For more information, please refer OWASP password storage cheat sheet.

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The hardcoded passwords have been replaced with a placeholder "{{SSMS_PASSWORD}}" in the input JSON and an environment variable retrieval using os.Getenv("SSMS_PASSWORD") in the code, which should be set securely outside the codebase.

Suggested change
Password: "gcwp-szwehjul",
{
Input: `{
"method": "aes-128-gcm",
"password": "{{SSMS_PASSWORD}}"
}`,
Parser: loadJSON(creator),
Output: &shadowsocks.ServerConfig{
Users: []*protocol.User{{
Account: serial.ToTypedMessage(&shadowsocks.Account{
CipherType: shadowsocks.CipherType_AES_128_GCM,
Password: os.Getenv("SSMS_PASSWORD"), // import "os"
}),
}},
Network: []net.Network{net.Network_TCP},

json={
"name": "team_name",
"email": "team@examplectf.com",
"password": "password",
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Description: Potential hardcoded credential detected. This code may contain sensitive data such as passwords or API keys embedded directly in the source. Hardcoded credentials can be extracted and misused, leading to unauthorized access to systems or data breaches. To remediate this, store secrets in environment variables or use a secrets management tool like AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, or HashiCorp Vault. Avoid committing credentials to version control. For best practices, refer to - https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Use_of_hard-coded_password

Severity: Critical

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The hardcoded password has been replaced with an environment variable retrieval using os.environ.get('TEAM_PASSWORD'). This removes the sensitive data from the source code and allows for secure management of the password through environment variables.

Suggested change
"password": "password",
json={
"name": "team_name",
"email": "team@examplectf.com",
"password": os.environ.get('TEAM_PASSWORD'), # import os
"affiliation": "changed",
},
)
team = Teams.query.filter_by(id=1).first()
assert r.status_code == 200
assert r.get_json()["data"]["affiliation"] == "changed"
assert verify_password(os.environ.get('TEAM_PASSWORD'), team.password)
destroy_ctfd(app)

@amazon-q-developer
Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ I finished the code review, and left comments with the issues I found. I will now generate code fix suggestions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant