Skip to content

fix coverage of isolated tests#1314

Merged
bdraco merged 13 commits intoaio-libs:masterfrom
Vizonex:coverage-of-isolated
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

fix coverage of isolated tests#1314
bdraco merged 13 commits intoaio-libs:masterfrom
Vizonex:coverage-of-isolated

Conversation

@Vizonex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Vizonex Vizonex commented Apr 3, 2026

What do these changes do?

Dreamsorcerer has brought up with me a pretty interesting idea with me on matrix to help us fix code coverage with the isolated tests which I have now chosen to take his advice on.

This PR is meant to assist with fixing code coverage of isolated tests being added. This has been a recent problem with #1310 & #1311 as they fail to pass due to missing it's code coverage.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

Maintainers working on multidict weather it's patching bugs or adding new features should have a less stressful time trying to put together bug scripts for the C Extension of multidict now if this PR passes through.

Related issue number

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes

@Vizonex Vizonex requested a review from asvetlov as a code owner April 3, 2026 17:57
Vizonex added a commit to Vizonex/multidict that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2026
@Vizonex Vizonex requested a review from webknjaz as a code owner April 3, 2026 18:00
@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Apr 3, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 245 untouched benchmarks


Comparing Vizonex:coverage-of-isolated (e5f45b9) with master (b9d13e6)

Open in CodSpeed

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.85%. Comparing base (b9d13e6) to head (e5f45b9).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1314      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.60%   99.85%   +2.24%     
==========================================
  Files          26       26              
  Lines        3513     3513              
  Branches      253      253              
==========================================
+ Hits         3429     3508      +79     
+ Misses         77        3      -74     
+ Partials        7        2       -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
CI-GHA 99.85% <ø> (+2.24%) ⬆️
pytest 99.85% <ø> (+2.24%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Vizonex and others added 2 commits April 3, 2026 20:28
Co-authored-by: 🇺🇦 Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua>
@Vizonex Vizonex requested a review from webknjaz April 4, 2026 01:47
Vizonex and others added 3 commits April 4, 2026 11:48
Co-authored-by: 🇺🇦 Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua>
@bdraco bdraco dismissed webknjaz’s stale review April 13, 2026 02:11

comments now addressed

@bdraco bdraco merged commit ecc83e1 into aio-libs:master Apr 13, 2026
71 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants