Conversation
- Test artifacts. - Add more assertions for streaming: validate all events. - Fix non-streaming tests which were actually streaming.
Summary of ChangesHello @ishymko, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the robustness and maintainability of the integration test suite. By centralizing client setup through a Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly refactors and improves the integration and end-to-end tests. The introduction of ClientFactory and parametrized fixtures for different transports greatly enhances test maintainability and reduces code duplication. The fixes for non-streaming tests and the addition of more thorough assertions for streaming events, including artifact validation, improve test correctness and robustness. Overall, these are excellent changes that increase the quality of the test suite. I've added a few minor suggestions for consistency and simplification.
I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.
tests/integration/test_client_server_integration.py (249)
The lambda function here is unnecessary. You can directly pass grpc.aio.insecure_channel as the grpc_channel_factory.
grpc_channel_factory=grpc.aio.insecure_channel,
tests/integration/test_client_server_integration.py (555)
The lambda function here is unnecessary. You can directly pass grpc.aio.insecure_channel as the grpc_channel_factory.
grpc_channel_factory=grpc.aio.insecure_channel,
tests/integration/test_client_server_integration.py (869)
The lambda function here is unnecessary. You can directly pass grpc.aio.insecure_channel as the grpc_channel_factory.
grpc_channel_factory=grpc.aio.insecure_channel,
tests/integration/test_end_to_end.py (202)
For consistency with test_client_server_integration.py, consider disabling streaming by modifying the agent card's capabilities instead of the client config. This more accurately simulates an agent that doesn't support streaming.
client._card.capabilities.streaming = False
tests/integration/test_end_to_end.py (229)
For consistency with test_client_server_integration.py, consider disabling streaming by modifying the agent card's capabilities instead of the client config. This more accurately simulates an agent that doesn't support streaming.
client._card.capabilities.streaming = False
Description