Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 143cf60c5f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| { | ||
| "idx": 0, | ||
| "version": "7", | ||
| "when": 1761181940319, | ||
| "tag": "0000_deep_rick_jones", | ||
| "breakpoints": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "idx": 1, | ||
| "version": "7", | ||
| "when": 1771560584355, | ||
| "tag": "0001_mature_kingpin", | ||
| "breakpoints": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "idx": 2, | ||
| "version": "7", | ||
| "when": 1775000000000, | ||
| "tag": "0003_external_user_identities", | ||
| "when": 1774625025579, | ||
| "tag": "0000_overjoyed_talkback", | ||
| "breakpoints": true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Preserve applied migration entries in journal
This change rewrites the Drizzle migration history to a single new 0000 entry, which breaks upgrades for any database that already applied the previous migrations. In that environment, drizzle-kit migrate will treat 0000_overjoyed_talkback as unapplied and try to re-run its CREATE TABLE statements against existing tables, causing migration failure and blocking deploys. Keep the existing historical entries/files and add a forward migration instead of replacing prior migration lineage.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
No description provided.