Speed up PP field iteration#7089
Conversation
⏱️ Performance Benchmark Report: f7e0401Performance shiftsFull benchmark resultsGenerated by GHA run |
|
Benchmarks drift by 1-2% between each run, which is why there is a concept of 'significant' changes. But it's worth noting that all the PP benchmarks drifted in the 'correct' direction, so there has probably been a small impact, in a good way. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7089 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.12% 90.12%
=======================================
Files 91 91
Lines 24951 24953 +2
Branches 4683 4683
=======================================
+ Hits 22488 22490 +2
Misses 1684 1684
Partials 779 779 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
ukmo-ccbunney
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nicely done! 👌🏼
Plus we've learnt something about Python and NumPy file pointer interactions! 🤓
Is it worth updating this PR's summary to include why the change was made for future reference?
🚀 Pull Request
Description
From a week of real world observations and a 1 hour conversation with Copilot.
Consult Iris pull request check list
Add any of the below labels to trigger actions on this PR: