Skip to content

Threat model check using Guardlink#509

Open
ashish-shroff-bugb wants to merge 2 commits intoSasanLabs:masterfrom
ashish-shroff-bugb:master
Open

Threat model check using Guardlink#509
ashish-shroff-bugb wants to merge 2 commits intoSasanLabs:masterfrom
ashish-shroff-bugb:master

Conversation

@ashish-shroff-bugb
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR creates annotations using Guardlink - helpful while creating threat model. Threat model.md is attached as well with the report.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 49.00%. Comparing base (40808f1) to head (359781b).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ility/sampleVulnerability/SampleVulnerability.java 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #509      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     49.07%   49.00%   -0.07%     
  Complexity      346      346              
============================================
  Files            56       57       +1     
  Lines          2101     2104       +3     
  Branches        226      226              
============================================
  Hits           1031     1031              
- Misses          989      992       +3     
  Partials         81       81              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@preetkaran20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ashish-shroff-bugb what is the purpose of this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants