chore: removed unused oauth_provider_kind field from mcp store#1345
Merged
charlesvien merged 3 commits intomainfrom Apr 2, 2026
Merged
chore: removed unused oauth_provider_kind field from mcp store#1345charlesvien merged 3 commits intomainfrom
charlesvien merged 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
cvolzer3
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
I need to cleanup the generated types after the PR in the main gets merged |
Contributor
|
PostHog/posthog#51790 |
charlesvien
force-pushed
the
chore/remove-oauth-provider-kind
branch
from
452dfbc to
b6cd928
Compare
charlesvien
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2026
charlesvien
force-pushed
the
chore/remove-oauth-provider-kind
branch
2 times, most recently
from
aead76a to
5ea2a67
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
I removed this from the main repo, so cleaning it up here.
Changes
Removed a field
How did you test this?
Tested locally