Skip to content

vim -> nvim migration#170

Open
Notgnoshi wants to merge 46 commits intomasterfrom
dev/nvim
Open

vim -> nvim migration#170
Notgnoshi wants to merge 46 commits intomasterfrom
dev/nvim

Conversation

@Notgnoshi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

return {
{
"nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter",
branch = "master",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I need to upgrade to the main branch, but the main branch is a significant change, and I'll need to do quite a bit more work.

Further, it requires nvim 0.12+, which the Ubuntu snap is updated to, but Fedora 43 is still on 0.11. (Maybe I upgrade to Fedora 44?, or perhaps I install nvim differently?)

@Notgnoshi Notgnoshi force-pushed the dev/nvim branch 2 times, most recently from 35e00c5 to a84a250 Compare May 4, 2026 20:10
Notgnoshi added 2 commits May 5, 2026 17:52
I think I'm fairly convinced now to switch to the new thing. I don't
like change, but it seems pretty nice. No big major features, just a bit
more polished, more performant, and possibly more future-proof?
Notgnoshi added 19 commits May 5, 2026 19:06
I've covered everything I can think of. We'll see what I missed when I
start using nvim more heavily :)
I don't use it, so remove it to relieve maintenance burden.
I don't want the title of the running program in the window title, just
the name of the directory. And if it's in a Git repository, I want the
name of the repository, not the CWD basename.
I'll need to either update to Fedora 44 at home, or use some other
method other than dnf to install nvim at home. The main branch of
nvim-treesitter only supports nvim 0.12+.
This allows me to get nvim 0.12+ on both Fedora and Ubuntu without
relying on PPAs or building from source.
LSP was started before config was created and passed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant