-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
[advoptm] Spectral Normalization for Muon Variants #1263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
Koratahiu
wants to merge
11
commits into
Nerogar:master
Choose a base branch
from
Koratahiu:SN_MUON
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e432c14
initial
Koratahiu b359a15
dev1
Koratahiu 972ee77
dev2
Koratahiu 1d49175
dev3
Koratahiu 6ca6f52
dev4
Koratahiu e40579a
add Chroma residual filter
Koratahiu 2bc6ae1
stable 2.2 and edit rms tooltip
Koratahiu 31287b2
remove the print
Koratahiu 44cca26
use .values()
Koratahiu 14814d7
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/Nerogar/OneTrainer into S…
Koratahiu 7b0916a
revert layer_counts
Koratahiu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this function always returns
{}:layer_countsis never modified.it doesn't seem to have side effects either.
what is it supposed to do?
it appears that it's supposed to count the number of trained layers, I guess for scaling later in the optimizer.
But why does it have its own regex layer filter? Shouldn't the count depend on what layers the user is actually training (via the layer filter on the
trainingtab)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed, it was deleted accidently
It calculates the model depth (the number of residual layers). For SDXL, this consists of
transformer_blocksandresnets; for Transformers, it includes onlytransformer_blocks(or their equivalent names).I think, we have two additional options:
You may ask why we need the depth. To achieve scale-invariance in the optimizer, we must utilize the depth as follows:
This ensures that the damping factor grows as the model grows. For example, with Klein 8B and Klein 4B, these scalings allow us to use the same hyperparameters for both models.