chore(hotkey): add new @private component#3977
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 5 minutes and 28 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)mermaid Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
b49f337 to
5815a86
Compare
df5620a to
80610fb
Compare
2798a4c to
1cc5625
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
Documentation has been published to https://lundalogik.github.io/lime-elements/versions/PR-3977/ |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
1cc5625 to
9fd6340
Compare
d0d36ff to
66462bb
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
Review recommendation addressed in 5b780bd: Added |
Consolidated PR Review -- 6 Dimensions (re-review after fixups)PR SummaryPR #3977 adds a new 1. Backward Compatibility -- SAFE ✅No backward compatibility concerns. The PR is purely additive with zero modifications to existing code.
2. Code Quality -- GOOD ✅Well-structured code with thorough tests. A few minor improvements possible.
3. Architecture -- GOOD ✅Clean component design with well-defined boundaries.
4. Security -- SAFE ✅No security issues found.
5. Observability -- SAFE ✅No significant issues found. Absence of logging is entirely appropriate.
6. Performance -- GOOD ✅No performance concerns.
Overall Verdicts
Top Recommendations
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@src/components/hotkey/format-display-token.ts`:
- Around line 74-76: The ternary returning object literals causes formatter/lint
failure; replace the inline ternary in format-display-token (the branch that
checks lower === 'backspace') with an explicit if/else that returns the two
objects each on their own lines (e.g., return { display: 'Backspace', isGlyph:
false, ariaName: 'Backspace' } in the if block and return { display: 'Del',
isGlyph: false, ariaName: 'Delete' } in the else) so the objects are formatted
in a lint-safe multiline style and the formatter no longer errors.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9b759d4e-9039-463a-9eaf-8b8a1954a145
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/hotkey/format-display-token.spec.tssrc/components/hotkey/format-display-token.tssrc/components/hotkey/hotkey.tsx
| return lower === 'backspace' | ||
| ? { display: 'Backspace', isGlyph: false, ariaName: 'Backspace' } | ||
| : { display: 'Del', isGlyph: false, ariaName: 'Delete' }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix lint-blocking object formatting in the ternary branch.
Line 75 currently violates the formatter rule reported by CI, which can block merge despite correct runtime behavior.
♻️ Proposed lint-safe formatting
return lower === 'backspace'
- ? { display: 'Backspace', isGlyph: false, ariaName: 'Backspace' }
+ ? {
+ display: 'Backspace',
+ isGlyph: false,
+ ariaName: 'Backspace',
+ }
: { display: 'Del', isGlyph: false, ariaName: 'Delete' };🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint
[failure] 75-75:
Replace ·display:·'Backspace',·isGlyph:·false,·ariaName:·'Backspace' with ⏎······················display:·'Backspace',⏎······················isGlyph:·false,⏎······················ariaName:·'Backspace',⏎·················
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@src/components/hotkey/format-display-token.ts` around lines 74 - 76, The
ternary returning object literals causes formatter/lint failure; replace the
inline ternary in format-display-token (the branch that checks lower ===
'backspace') with an explicit if/else that returns the two objects each on their
own lines (e.g., return { display: 'Backspace', isGlyph: false, ariaName:
'Backspace' } in the if block and return { display: 'Del', isGlyph: false,
ariaName: 'Delete' } in the else) so the objects are formatted in a lint-safe
multiline style and the formatter no longer errors.
|
Review recommendation #1 addressed in 705bc4d: Added an Recommendation #2 (normalize tokens via |
d300c3e to
2db801c
Compare
for visualizing keyboard shortcuts as styled `<kbd>` elements with platform-aware glyphs.
2db801c to
bb97913
Compare
|
@Kiarokh, I'm gonna prioritise getting this approved and merged now, so I won't implement it now, but this suggestion from the latest "Consolidated PR Review" sounds like something you might want to look at later:
|
|
@Kiarokh, again, let's get this PR merged, so don't make changes here, but I think the dark mode styling might need some tweaks. Light mode is great:
But dark mode is so-so. The enabled style is ok, but doesn't really give the "button" impression the same way as the light mode styling (not sure what, if anything, can be done about that, and you've probably already looked at it—still, I wanted to mention it just in case). But the bigger problem is the disabled style, which I think is not very obviously disabled (especially not if there wasn't an enabled one next to it, to compare against):
|
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 39.10.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |


for visualizing keyboard shortcuts as styled
<kbd>elementswith platform-aware glyphs.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Examples
Style
Tests
Review:
Browsers tested:
(Check any that applies, it's ok to leave boxes unchecked if testing something didn't seem relevant.)
Windows:
Linux:
macOS:
Mobile: