Skip to content

Review notes for #9911 (opencode v1.14.30 merge)#9913

Open
kilo-code-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomarkijbema/kilo-opencode-v1.14.30from
review/pr-9911
Open

Review notes for #9911 (opencode v1.14.30 merge)#9913
kilo-code-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomarkijbema/kilo-opencode-v1.14.30from
review/pr-9911

Conversation

@kilo-code-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kilo-code-bot kilo-code-bot Bot commented May 5, 2026

Summary

Adds two review notes for PR #9911 (upstream opencode v1.14.30 merge), produced by agents so a human can sanity-check the risky bits quickly. Not intended to merge — delete the branch after review.

  • KILOCODE_CHANGE_MARKERS.md — per-file audit of kilocode_change marker preservation across the 165 changed files. 2 findings raised (1 missing marker on a Kilo-specific flag rename in server/backend.ts; 1 needs-human-eyes note on the session-list filtering merge in session/session.ts).
  • INFRASTRUCTURE_CHANGE.md — audit of CI / build / release infra touched by the merge. 2 findings raised (stray empty peerDependencies: {} in packages/core/package.json; Zed extension URLs/version rewritten back to upstream values and rely on the release pipeline rewriting them). .github/workflows/**, .changeset/**, and all root tooling — zero delta, no upstream CI leaked in.

Based on markijbema/kilo-opencode-v1.14.30 so the diff contains only the two review files.

Two review files covering marker preservation and infra leakage for human sign-off. Not intended to merge; scoped to the review branch stacked on #9911.
@kilo-code-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

kilo-code-bot Bot commented May 5, 2026

Code Review Summary

Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Files Reviewed (2 files)
  • INFRASTRUCTURE_CHANGE.md
  • KILOCODE_CHANGE_MARKERS.md

Reviewed by gpt-5.5-2026-04-23 · 103,477 tokens

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants