[codex] Add launch contract event spine#69
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
contractEventspine to MemorySignals so each signal recordsIFlowPulse.FlowPulseevent semantics, topic0 matching, pulse type names, indexed fields, payload fields, and receipt-derived locator fields.contractEventRefto RootflowTransitions so transition output traces back to the contract event behind the MemorySignal.Why
The launch-core path needed to show the concrete bridge from contract events to Flow Memory outputs without implying contracts know receipt-only fields such as
txHashorlogIndexduring execution.Validation
npm run launch:v0npm testnpm run e2enpm test --prefix services/flowmemorynpm test --prefix apps/dashboardnpm run build --prefix apps/dashboardhttp://127.0.0.1:5173/#/flowmemorywith zero console errorsforge testcargo test --manifest-path crates/flowmemory-devnet/Cargo.tomlnpm test,npm run validate:vectors, andpython validate_test_vectors.pyincrypto/python hardware/simulator/flowrouter_sim.py --validate-file hardware/fixtures/flowrouter_sample_seed42.jsonBoundaries
Still local/test V0 only. This does not claim production L1 readiness, Base mainnet readiness, production Uniswap v4 deployment, full trustless verification, free storage, AI running on-chain, or production hardware readiness.