Skip to content

feat: replace manual review agent config with ce:review delegation#381

Merged
tmchow merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/cleanup-cework-review
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

feat: replace manual review agent config with ce:review delegation#381
tmchow merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/cleanup-cework-review

Conversation

@tmchow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tmchow tmchow commented Mar 26, 2026

ce:work's Phase 3 review step previously read agent lists from compound-engineering.local.md and ran them directly — a model that was superseded when ce:review gained intelligent tiered selection in #371. This removes the stale indirection and delegates to ce:review with mode:autofix, which fixes safe issues automatically and flags the rest before shipping.

What changed:

  • ce:work / ce:work-beta — Phase 3 step 2 now loads ce:review with mode:autofix instead of reading agents from .local.md. The delegate prompt section references CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md instead of the removed settings file.
  • setup skill — Reduced to a placeholder. The interactive wizard that generated .local.md is removed since review agent selection is fully automatic. The skill is preserved for future project-level config needs in coming later in feat: add doctor diagnostic skill and extend setup with dependency management #345
  • ce:compound — Removed stale line referencing .local.md and the setup skill for agent customization.
  • README — Updated setup skill description to reflect current state.

Compound Engineering v2.53.0
🤖 Generated with Claude Opus 4.6 (200K context, extended thinking) via Claude Code

…egation

ce:work and ce:work-beta now delegate to ce:review with mode:autofix
instead of reading agent lists from compound-engineering.local.md.
The setup skill is reduced to a placeholder since review agent selection
is handled automatically. Stale .local.md references removed from
ce:compound and delegate prompt sections.
@tmchow tmchow merged commit fed9fd6 into main Mar 26, 2026
2 checks passed
This was referenced Mar 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant