You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
⚠️1 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)
📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1 error(s)
Show output
error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:275:1
│
275 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
│ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
│
├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
├ ## Impact
When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
## Patches
A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
rather than exhausting the stack.
## Workarounds
Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
├ time v0.3.41
└── tracing-appender v0.2.3
└── libdd-log v1.0.0
└── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.0
advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok
This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.
❌ Patch coverage is 98.63636% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 71.26%. Comparing base (102231d) to head (49ba1c9). ⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 49ba1c9 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? React with 👍/👎 or give us feedback!
duncanpharvey
changed the title
feat: implement span derived primary tags
feat(stats): implement span derived primary tags
Mar 27, 2026
duncanpharvey
changed the title
feat(stats): implement span derived primary tags
feat!(stats): implement span derived primary tags
Mar 27, 2026
duncanpharvey
changed the title
feat!(stats): implement span derived primary tags
feat(stats)!: implement span derived primary tags
Mar 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
A brief description of the change being made with this pull request.
Motivation
Support span derived primary tags for Serverless.
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/SVLS-8032
Additional Notes
Relates to DataDog/serverless-components#51
How to test the change?
Describe here in detail how the change can be validated.