Skip to content

chore(spdx): add Apache-2.0 SPDX header to three missing CI / compose files#275

Merged
CryptoJones merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/spdx-headers-on-ci-yaml
May 19, 2026
Merged

chore(spdx): add Apache-2.0 SPDX header to three missing CI / compose files#275
CryptoJones merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/spdx-headers-on-ci-yaml

Conversation

@CryptoJones
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Every other YAML / config file in the repo carries the SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + copyright header on the first two lines (matching the policy tests/unit/spdx-headers.test.js enforces for .js files). Three files were missed:

  • .github/workflows/test.yml
  • .woodpecker.yml
  • docker-compose.override.yml

What changed

Added the standard 2-line header to each. .woodpecker.yml also picks up a one-line description (it was previously bare when: with no comment block at all) noting that it mirrors the GitHub Actions workflow.

Test plan

  • npm run lint && npm test — 760 passing
  • No behavior change.

Proudly Made in Nebraska. Go Big Red! 🌽 https://xkcd.com/2347/

…pose files

Every other YAML / config file in the repo (\`docker-compose.yml\`,
\`docker-compose.tls.yml\`, \`.github/dependabot.yml\`,
\`caddy/Caddyfile\`, \`.dockerignore\`, …) carries the
\`SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0\` + copyright header on the
first two lines, per the project convention enforced for \`.js\` files
by tests/unit/spdx-headers.test.js.

Three files were missed:
  - .github/workflows/test.yml
  - .woodpecker.yml
  - docker-compose.override.yml

Add the header to each. .woodpecker.yml also picks up a one-line
description (it was previously bare \`when:\` with no comment block at
all) explaining that it mirrors the GitHub Actions workflow.

No behavior change. 760 tests still pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@CryptoJones CryptoJones merged commit 7cde35f into master May 19, 2026
3 checks passed
@CryptoJones CryptoJones deleted the chore/spdx-headers-on-ci-yaml branch May 19, 2026 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant