Skip to content

java, mitigate sdk break for aks#41612

Merged
weidongxu-microsoft merged 2 commits intomainfrom
migrate-containerservice
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

java, mitigate sdk break for aks#41612
weidongxu-microsoft merged 2 commits intomainfrom
migrate-containerservice

Conversation

@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft commented Mar 20, 2026

SDK configuration pull request

Purpose of this PR

  • Make changes to the SDK configuration only when there are no modifications to the API specification, eliminating the need for an ARM or Stewardship Board API review.

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

Getting help

  • First, carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
  • If you don't have permissions to remove or add labels to the PR, request write access per aka.ms/azsdk/access#request-access-to-rest-api-or-sdk-repositories
  • To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

Comment generated by summarize-checks workflow run.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added resource-manager TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec labels Mar 20, 2026
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2026 07:53
@github-actions github-actions Bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Mar 20, 2026
@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

weidongxu-microsoft commented Mar 20, 2026

need SDK PR merge first
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#48491

@github-actions github-actions Bot added ARMAutoSignedOff-Trivial ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Mar 20, 2026
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft changed the title java, mitigate for aks java, mitigate sdk break for aks Mar 20, 2026
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft added the PublishToCustomers Acknowledgement the changes will be published to Azure customers. label Mar 23, 2026
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft merged commit 7d2a84d into main Mar 23, 2026
50 checks passed
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft deleted the migrate-containerservice branch March 23, 2026 09:18
markcowl pushed a commit to markcowl/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
markcowl pushed a commit to markcowl/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2026
Ealianis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2026
Ealianis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMAutoSignedOff-Trivial ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review Container Service PublishToCustomers Acknowledgement the changes will be published to Azure customers. resource-manager TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants