Skip to content

{:ok} vs. :ok #23

@gossi

Description

@gossi

There is a case where {:ok} is used, but :ok would be the more expected type of code:

[ref to come]

which would better be written as:

  with :ok <- validate_transmission(response),
       :ok <- validate_server_headers(response),

I tried, and it works.

But at the same time turns vscode into a warning minefield:

Image

If it works without turning everything orange, I'd happily go for it.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions