Skip to content

ci: replace review + architect-review with multi-review#105

Closed
Svtter wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
worktree-test-multi-review
Closed

ci: replace review + architect-review with multi-review#105
Svtter wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
worktree-test-multi-review

Conversation

@Svtter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Svtter Svtter commented May 23, 2026

Summary

  • Add multi-review.yml workflow — runs 4 parallel reviewers (quality, security, performance, architecture) with coordinator synthesis, posting 1 consolidated comment
  • Remove review.yml and architect-review.yml — redundant with multi-review
  • Add multi-review smoke test steps to ci.yml and smoke-test.yml

Test plan

  • CI smoke test passes (multi-review action loads without error)
  • Multi-review workflow runs on this PR and posts a coordinator-synthesized comment
  • feature-missing.yml still runs independently (not covered by multi-review)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add multi-review.yml workflow that runs 4 parallel reviewers
(quality, security, performance, architecture) with coordinator
synthesis. Remove redundant review.yml and architect-review.yml
which are now covered by multi-review. Add multi-review smoke
test steps to ci.yml and smoke-test.yml.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

发现遗漏

经过分析,PR 存在以下功能遗漏:

MEDIUM

architect-review.yml 没有按 PR 描述删除,而是重命名为了 multi-review.yml
PR body 写的是 "Remove review.yml and architect-review.yml" — redundant with multi-review",但实现方式是将 architect-review.ymlrename 为multi-review.yml而非删除后新建。虽然最终效果上旧的 architect-review workflow 不再存在,但 git 层面这不是"删除"而是"重命名",与 PR 描述不完全一致。应删除architect-review.yml并创建全新的multi-review.yml`,或在 PR 描述中明确说明是 rename。

New%20session%20-%202026-05-23T15%3A14%3A52.941Z
opencode session  |  github run

@Svtter Svtter closed this May 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant