{
"status": "failed",
"error": "Failed to process successful response"
}
request:
{
"repo_url": "https://github.com/stakwork/hive",
"prompt": ""You are a technical project manager generating minimal, actionable, developer-ready tickets.\n\nBefore generating any tasks:\n- Research the codebase based on the context provided\n- Verify whether the provided feature context (title, brief, user stories, requirements, architecture) is:\n- factually correct\n- actually implemented\n- technically feasible,\n- aligned with existing code patterns\n- using the best available utilities, shared helpers, or dry/common functions.\n- returning your result in json format without any other commentary\n\nDetect missing elements, outdated assumptions, incorrect architecture descriptions, or misaligned requirements.\n\nYour task:\n1. Analyze the feature context (title, brief, personas, user stories, requirements, architecture)\n2. Break the work into the MINIMUM number of actionable, implementable tasks\n3. Each ticket should be something a developer or AI agent can immediately start working on\n4. Map dependencies between tickets using temporary IDs (T1, T2, T3...)\n5. Return just a single phase, with a ticket(s) in json format below\n\nKey Philosophy - ACTIONABLE & COMBINED:\n- Bug fix = 1 ticket: \"Fix [issue]\" (NOT: investigate, then fix, then validate)\n- Small feature = 1 tickets (NOT: setup, implement, test, document separately), ideally should be a single ticket\n- Medium feature = 1-2 tickets (NOT: 10+ micro-tasks)\n- Large feature = 1-3 tickets maximum\n\nAlways prioritise detailed tickets with a small number of tickets. Most tasks can be a single ticket with multiple steps within.\n\nCRITICAL RULES:\n1. NO separate \"investigate\" or \"research\" tickets - investigation is part of the fix\n2. NO separate \"validate\" or \"test\" tickets - testing is part of implementation\n3. NO separate \"document\" tickets - documentation should not be part of the work\n4. Combine: implementation with testable chunks of code = 1 ticket\n5. Only create ONE phase\n6. If the architecture defines new mock data that is needed, create a ticket that has the coding agent check for existing mock data (in the seed script or query the database itself) and generate new seed scripts to satisfy the data changes outlined in the architecture\n\nGood Examples:\n\"Fix nodes issue in testing workspace\" (fix and validation)\n\"Add user authentication with JWT tokens\" (includes API, middleware, unit/integration tests)\n\"Build task management UI with drag-drop and filtering\" (complete feature with tests)\n\nBad Examples:\n\"Investigate nodes issue\" (investigation is not a deliverable)\n\"Write tests for authentication\" (tests should be part of auth ticket)\n\"Write E2E tests\" (focus on unit and integration tests, not E2E)\n\"Document API endpoints\" (docs should not be part of the work)\n\"Setup database\" then \"Add migrations\" then \"Test database\" (should be 1 ticket)\n\nTicket Structure:\n- Title: Actionable verb + what to build (e.g., \"Fix X\", \"Add Y\", \"Build Z\")\n- Description: What to implement, acceptance criteria, how to verify it works\n- Tests: Include unit and integration tests ONLY (NO E2E tests, NO end-to-end tests)\n- Priority: CRITICAL (blockers), HIGH (core features), MEDIUM (standard), LOW (nice-to-have)\n- Include enough context so a developer can start coding immediately\n\nDependency Mapping:\n- Assign each ticket a unique tempId: \"T1\", \"T2\", \"T3\"... (sequential)\n- Use dependsOn array to reference earlier ticket tempIds\n- Only create dependencies for actual technical blockers (e.g., auth must exist before protected routes)\n- Prefer parallel work - don't over-constrain\n\n## Output Format: (a single phase with all tickets in json)\n- DO NOT return any other commentary outside of the json response\n- DO NOT wrap the output of your final answer inside triple-backtick code fences of any kind\n- DO NOT include a fenced code block (```json) in the output\n<example_output_format>\n{\n \"phases\": [\n {\n \"name\": \"Phase 1\",\n \"description\": \"Add workflow status notification\",\n \"tasks\": [\n {\n \"title\": \"Create status field on WorkflowRuns table and update it on webhook call\",\n \"description\": \"Create column and prisma migration for status column on WorkflowRuns table. When a the /stakwork/webhook endpoint is called, update the status column on the WorkflowRuns table\",\n \"priority\": \"CRITICAL\",\n \"tempId\": \"T1\",\n \"dependsOn\": []\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"Add real-time notifications with Pusher integration\",\n \"description\": \"Integrate Pusher client library, create notification service, add UI toast components, implement backend event broadcasting. Include integration tests for notification delivery.\",\n \"priority\": \"HIGH\",\n \"tempId\": \"T2\",\n \"dependsOn\": [\"T1\"]\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n}\n</example_output_format>\n\nRemember: Every ticket should be immediately actionable. A developer should be able to read the ticket and start coding. No planning tickets, no research tickets, no separate testing tickets. DO NOT suggest creating E2E or end-to-end tests - only unit and integration tests.\n\n\n<title>\nBuild: Tasks: Task list for a feature and phase final column 3 dots bug\n</title>\n\nDependency lists can become too large and overlap the three-dot actions menu. We should cap visible dependencies and hide any overflow beneath the existing three-dot menu, which must always remain visible as the final column.\n\n<user_stories>\n\n</user_stories>\n\n## Overview\n\nWhen a task has many dependencies, the badge list can overflow its column and overlap the action menu (three dots), making critical actions inaccessible.\n\n## Functional Requirements\n\n1. The system must limit the visible dependencies to a maximum count that fits within the dependencies column width without overflow.\n2. When dependencies exceed the visible limit, the system must display a \"+N more\" indicator showing the count of hidden dependencies.\n3. All dependencies (visible and hidden) must remain accessible within the existing dropdown menu that opens when clicking the dependencies cell.\n4. The three-dot action menu must always remain fully visible and clickable as the rightmost column, without any overlap from dependency badges.\n5. New: The system must calculate the visible dependency limit dynamically based on average task title length to prevent overflow in all scenarios.\n\n## Gaps\n\n- It is unclear whether hovering over the \"+N more\" indicator should show a tooltip with hidden dependency names, or if users must open the dropdown to see them.\n- The exact number of visible dependencies before truncation needs to be determined (suggested: 2-3 badges before showing \"+N more\").\n\n\n\n## Overview\n\nDependency badges in the task table overflow their 200px column width and obscure the three-dot action menu; implement a maximum visible badge count (2 badges), truncate overflow with a \"+N more\" indicator that shows a tooltip on hover listing hidden dependency names, and ensure the action menu remains accessible.\n\n## Mock Data Requirements\n\nMock data required - Need to test the truncation behavior with varying dependency counts and ensure the tooltip displays correctly.\n\nRequired seed data enhancements:\n- Existing: src/utils/mockSeedData.ts already creates tasks with dependencies (1-2 dependencies per task)\n- New: Add test scenario with task having 5+ dependencies to verify truncation at 2 visible badges\n- Edge cases: Tasks with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5+ dependencies to test all badge display states\n\nSeed location: Extend existing `seedTasks` function in `src/utils/mockSeedData.ts` around line 730\n\n## Changes Required\n\n### 1. Update DependenciesCombobox Component\n\nModified: `src/components/features/DependenciesCombobox/index.tsx`\n- Add constant `MAX_VISIBLE_DEPENDENCIES = 1` (shows first badge, replaces with \"+N more\")\n- Slice `selectedTickets` to show only first badge when count > 2\n- Render \"+N more\" badge as last item when dependencies exceed 2\n- Wrap \"+N more\" badge in `Tooltip` component showing comma-separated list of hidden dependency titles\n- Import `Tooltip`, `TooltipTrigger`, `TooltipContent` from `@/components/ui/tooltip`\n- Ensure badges use `flex-wrap` but apply `overflow-hidden` to prevent visual overflow beyond column width\n\n### 2. Add Unit Tests\n\nNew: `src/tests/unit/components/features/DependenciesCombobox.test.tsx`\n- Test with 0, 1, 2 dependencies (full display)\n- Test with 3, 5 dependencies (truncation with \"+N more\")\n- Test tooltip content shows correct hidden dependency names\n- Test that X button on visible badges removes dependency\n- Verify \"+N more\" badge is not removable (no X button)\n\n### 3. Enhance Mock Data\n\nModified: `src/utils/mockSeedData.ts`\n- Add Scenario 6 after line 730: Create task with 5 dependencies to test truncation\n- Add comment explaining this tests the \"+N more\" UI behavior\n\n## Testing Considerations\n\n- Unit tests verify badge truncation logic and tooltip content accuracy\n- Mock data with 5+ dependencies validates UI doesn't overflow in real table layout\n- Test tooltip appears on hover without interfering with dropdown click behavior\n- Verify action menu (three dots) remains clickable in all dependency count scenarios\n\n\n<current_tasks>\n\n</current_tasks>\n"",
"username": "tomsmith8",
"pat": "...",
"jsonSchema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"phases": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string"
},
"description": {
"type": "string"
},
"tasks": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"title": {
"type": "string"
},
"description": {
"type": "string"
},
"priority": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"CRITICAL",
"HIGH",
"MEDIUM",
"LOW"
]
},
"tempId": {
"type": "string"
},
"dependsOn": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
"required": [
"title",
"description",
"priority",
"tempId",
"dependsOn"
]
}
}
},
"required": [
"name",
"description",
"tasks"
]
}
}
},
"required": [
"phases"
]
},
"toolsConfig": null,
"logs": true
}
{
"status": "failed",
"error": "Failed to process successful response"
}
request:
{
"repo_url": "https://github.com/stakwork/hive",
"prompt": ""You are a technical project manager generating minimal, actionable, developer-ready tickets.\n\nBefore generating any tasks:\n- Research the codebase based on the context provided\n- Verify whether the provided feature context (title, brief, user stories, requirements, architecture) is:\n- factually correct\n- actually implemented\n- technically feasible,\n- aligned with existing code patterns\n- using the best available utilities, shared helpers, or dry/common functions.\n- returning your result in json format without any other commentary\n\nDetect missing elements, outdated assumptions, incorrect architecture descriptions, or misaligned requirements.\n\nYour task:\n1. Analyze the feature context (title, brief, personas, user stories, requirements, architecture)\n2. Break the work into the MINIMUM number of actionable, implementable tasks\n3. Each ticket should be something a developer or AI agent can immediately start working on\n4. Map dependencies between tickets using temporary IDs (T1, T2, T3...)\n5. Return just a single phase, with a ticket(s) in json format below\n\nKey Philosophy - ACTIONABLE & COMBINED:\n- Bug fix = 1 ticket: \"Fix [issue]\" (NOT: investigate, then fix, then validate)\n- Small feature = 1 tickets (NOT: setup, implement, test, document separately), ideally should be a single ticket\n- Medium feature = 1-2 tickets (NOT: 10+ micro-tasks)\n- Large feature = 1-3 tickets maximum\n\nAlways prioritise detailed tickets with a small number of tickets. Most tasks can be a single ticket with multiple steps within.\n\nCRITICAL RULES:\n1. NO separate \"investigate\" or \"research\" tickets - investigation is part of the fix\n2. NO separate \"validate\" or \"test\" tickets - testing is part of implementation\n3. NO separate \"document\" tickets - documentation should not be part of the work\n4. Combine: implementation with testable chunks of code = 1 ticket\n5. Only create ONE phase\n6. If the architecture defines new mock data that is needed, create a ticket that has the coding agent check for existing mock data (in the seed script or query the database itself) and generate new seed scripts to satisfy the data changes outlined in the architecture\n\nGood Examples:\n\"Fix nodes issue in testing workspace\" (fix and validation)\n\"Add user authentication with JWT tokens\" (includes API, middleware, unit/integration tests)\n\"Build task management UI with drag-drop and filtering\" (complete feature with tests)\n\nBad Examples:\n\"Investigate nodes issue\" (investigation is not a deliverable)\n\"Write tests for authentication\" (tests should be part of auth ticket)\n\"Write E2E tests\" (focus on unit and integration tests, not E2E)\n\"Document API endpoints\" (docs should not be part of the work)\n\"Setup database\" then \"Add migrations\" then \"Test database\" (should be 1 ticket)\n\nTicket Structure:\n- Title: Actionable verb + what to build (e.g., \"Fix X\", \"Add Y\", \"Build Z\")\n- Description: What to implement, acceptance criteria, how to verify it works\n- Tests: Include unit and integration tests ONLY (NO E2E tests, NO end-to-end tests)\n- Priority: CRITICAL (blockers), HIGH (core features), MEDIUM (standard), LOW (nice-to-have)\n- Include enough context so a developer can start coding immediately\n\nDependency Mapping:\n- Assign each ticket a unique tempId: \"T1\", \"T2\", \"T3\"... (sequential)\n- Use dependsOn array to reference earlier ticket tempIds\n- Only create dependencies for actual technical blockers (e.g., auth must exist before protected routes)\n- Prefer parallel work - don't over-constrain\n\n## Output Format: (a single phase with all tickets in json)\n- DO NOT return any other commentary outside of the json response\n- DO NOT wrap the output of your final answer inside triple-backtick code fences of any kind\n- DO NOT include a fenced code block (```json) in the output\n<example_output_format>\n{\n \"phases\": [\n {\n \"name\": \"Phase 1\",\n \"description\": \"Add workflow status notification\",\n \"tasks\": [\n {\n \"title\": \"Create status field on WorkflowRuns table and update it on webhook call\",\n \"description\": \"Create column and prisma migration for status column on WorkflowRuns table. When a the /stakwork/webhook endpoint is called, update the status column on the WorkflowRuns table\",\n \"priority\": \"CRITICAL\",\n \"tempId\": \"T1\",\n \"dependsOn\": []\n },\n {\n \"title\": \"Add real-time notifications with Pusher integration\",\n \"description\": \"Integrate Pusher client library, create notification service, add UI toast components, implement backend event broadcasting. Include integration tests for notification delivery.\",\n \"priority\": \"HIGH\",\n \"tempId\": \"T2\",\n \"dependsOn\": [\"T1\"]\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n}\n</example_output_format>\n\nRemember: Every ticket should be immediately actionable. A developer should be able to read the ticket and start coding. No planning tickets, no research tickets, no separate testing tickets. DO NOT suggest creating E2E or end-to-end tests - only unit and integration tests.\n\n\n<title>\nBuild: Tasks: Task list for a feature and phase final column 3 dots bug\n</title>\n\nDependency lists can become too large and overlap the three-dot actions menu. We should cap visible dependencies and hide any overflow beneath the existing three-dot menu, which must always remain visible as the final column.\n\n<user_stories>\n\n</user_stories>\n\n## Overview\n\nWhen a task has many dependencies, the badge list can overflow its column and overlap the action menu (three dots), making critical actions inaccessible.\n\n## Functional Requirements\n\n1. The system must limit the visible dependencies to a maximum count that fits within the dependencies column width without overflow.\n2. When dependencies exceed the visible limit, the system must display a \"+N more\" indicator showing the count of hidden dependencies.\n3. All dependencies (visible and hidden) must remain accessible within the existing dropdown menu that opens when clicking the dependencies cell.\n4. The three-dot action menu must always remain fully visible and clickable as the rightmost column, without any overlap from dependency badges.\n5. New: The system must calculate the visible dependency limit dynamically based on average task title length to prevent overflow in all scenarios.\n\n## Gaps\n\n- It is unclear whether hovering over the \"+N more\" indicator should show a tooltip with hidden dependency names, or if users must open the dropdown to see them.\n- The exact number of visible dependencies before truncation needs to be determined (suggested: 2-3 badges before showing \"+N more\").\n\n\n\n## Overview\n\nDependency badges in the task table overflow their 200px column width and obscure the three-dot action menu; implement a maximum visible badge count (2 badges), truncate overflow with a \"+N more\" indicator that shows a tooltip on hover listing hidden dependency names, and ensure the action menu remains accessible.\n\n## Mock Data Requirements\n\nMock data required - Need to test the truncation behavior with varying dependency counts and ensure the tooltip displays correctly.\n\nRequired seed data enhancements:\n- Existing:
src/utils/mockSeedData.tsalready creates tasks with dependencies (1-2 dependencies per task)\n- New: Add test scenario with task having 5+ dependencies to verify truncation at 2 visible badges\n- Edge cases: Tasks with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5+ dependencies to test all badge display states\n\nSeed location: Extend existing `seedTasks` function in `src/utils/mockSeedData.ts` around line 730\n\n## Changes Required\n\n### 1. Update DependenciesCombobox Component\n\nModified: `src/components/features/DependenciesCombobox/index.tsx`\n- Add constant `MAX_VISIBLE_DEPENDENCIES = 1` (shows first badge, replaces with \"+N more\")\n- Slice `selectedTickets` to show only first badge when count > 2\n- Render \"+N more\" badge as last item when dependencies exceed 2\n- Wrap \"+N more\" badge in `Tooltip` component showing comma-separated list of hidden dependency titles\n- Import `Tooltip`, `TooltipTrigger`, `TooltipContent` from `@/components/ui/tooltip`\n- Ensure badges use `flex-wrap` but apply `overflow-hidden` to prevent visual overflow beyond column width\n\n### 2. Add Unit Tests\n\nNew: `src/tests/unit/components/features/DependenciesCombobox.test.tsx`\n- Test with 0, 1, 2 dependencies (full display)\n- Test with 3, 5 dependencies (truncation with \"+N more\")\n- Test tooltip content shows correct hidden dependency names\n- Test that X button on visible badges removes dependency\n- Verify \"+N more\" badge is not removable (no X button)\n\n### 3. Enhance Mock Data\n\nModified: `src/utils/mockSeedData.ts`\n- Add Scenario 6 after line 730: Create task with 5 dependencies to test truncation\n- Add comment explaining this tests the \"+N more\" UI behavior\n\n## Testing Considerations\n\n- Unit tests verify badge truncation logic and tooltip content accuracy\n- Mock data with 5+ dependencies validates UI doesn't overflow in real table layout\n- Test tooltip appears on hover without interfering with dropdown click behavior\n- Verify action menu (three dots) remains clickable in all dependency count scenarios\n\n\n<current_tasks>\n\n</current_tasks>\n"","username": "tomsmith8",
"pat": "...",
"jsonSchema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"phases": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string"
},
"description": {
"type": "string"
},
"tasks": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"title": {
"type": "string"
},
"description": {
"type": "string"
},
"priority": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"CRITICAL",
"HIGH",
"MEDIUM",
"LOW"
]
},
"tempId": {
"type": "string"
},
"dependsOn": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
"required": [
"title",
"description",
"priority",
"tempId",
"dependsOn"
]
}
}
},
"required": [
"name",
"description",
"tasks"
]
}
}
},
"required": [
"phases"
]
},
"toolsConfig": null,
"logs": true
}