-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
move hir typeck into separate crate #529
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
T-compilerAdd this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler teamAdd this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler teammajor-changeA proposal to make a major change to rustcA proposal to make a major change to rustcmajor-change-acceptedA major change proposal that was acceptedA major change proposal that was accepted
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
T-compilerAdd this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler teamAdd this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler teammajor-changeA proposal to make a major change to rustcA proposal to make a major change to rustcmajor-change-acceptedA major change proposal that was acceptedA major change proposal that was accepted
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Proposal
With rust-lang/rust#99015 landing, the
typeckquery is the only place using anFnCtxtand this should stay this way. HIR typeck is a fairly complex and self contained part of rustc and moving all of that in a separate, common place should make refactorings and cleanups easier. It should also be easier to understand and more difficult to misuse, as you would have to add a dependency on a new crate to use theFnCtxtnow.We should move the typeck queries,
FnCtxtand anything else exclusively used by HIR typeck to a new craterustc_hir_typeck.At the same time I also suggest renaming
rustc_typecktorustc_hir_analysisas that crate is responsible for so much more than simply "checking types".Mentors or Reviewers
If you have a reviewer or mentor in mind for this work, mention then
here. You can put your own name here if you are planning to mentor the
work.
Process
The main points of the Major Change Process are as follows:
@rustbot second.-C flag, then full team check-off is required.@rfcbot fcp mergeon either the MCP or the PR.You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.
Comments
This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.